I wanted to interject here and ask whether their concern about banning books is an absolute. How would people feel about banning a book because they have a racial slur within them. In 2019, there were Two New Jersey legislators who introduced a resolution calling on school districts in the state to ban ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ novel from their curricula in the whole state.
“The novel’s use of a racial slur and its depictions of racist attitudes can cause students to feel upset, marginalized or humiliated and can create an uncomfortable atmosphere in the classroom,’ is what the resolution said. It was written by Rep. Verlina Reynolds-Jackson and Jamel Holley. School districts in Pennsylvania, Virginia, Minnesota and Mississippi have removed the book from their curricula. In California, parents complained about the use of racist epithets in To Kill a Mockingbird ; Adventures of Huckleberry Finn ; The Cay ; Of Mice and Men ; and Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry , the Burbank (CA) Unified School District superintendent banned the books from the libraries in the whole district. He said “This is not about censorship, this is about righting the wrongs of the past.”
I am actually deeply interested in the topic of banning books and I want to ask: are you all primarily against banning books with graphic sex? And think kids should have access to sex so they can learn about it? Or are you against banning books, full stop-- and therefore, also against banning the books for the reasons I’ve pointed out here. I would say that despite the huge media coverage over Maus, there has been an equal amount of banning because of making students uncomfortable.