<p>racheljs</p>
<p>You sure you don’t want to give us more info about your academic orientation, personal interests, geographic preferences? Might be easier to offer advice with 6 disparate schools offered up for comparison.</p>
<p>Well, here goes:</p>
<p>I think it’s best to think about your choices in 3 groups. I’ll up front offer that I’ve visited all these colleges, some several times, with the exception of Whitman. Sorry Whitman.</p>
<p>Since this is a Carleton thread, it only seems right to start with:</p>
<p>Carleton, Grinnell and Whitman.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>All offer intimate campus-based experiences in rural-semirural outposts with, in size, Walla Walla (wins hands down on name) > Northfield > Grinnell. </p></li>
<li><p>While all are certainly LACs, Carleton’s student body is about 25% larger than the other 2. More similarities than differences in student personality profile - hard working, intellectual, individualistic, fun-loving.</p></li>
<li><p>Carleton offers easy access to Minneapolis-St. Paul, about 700,000 souls, with a metro area upwards of 3 million. The MSP airport is easy access to campus and an international hub. Grinnell and Whitman are significantly more isolated from any large city and major airport. </p></li>
<li><p>Carleton is measurably more competitive admissions-wise and rankings-wise than the other two, but not by a wide margin.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Amherst and Colby</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Both similarly offer campus-based experiences in rural-semirural outposts with Waterville not most people’s version of an ideal college town - Amherst closer to that image. Amherst has Northampton and four other colleges within not quite spitting distance. Have always felt the consortium is not very relevant to the Amherst experience with most kids staying pretty close to home (i.e. this is no Claremont consortium or Haverford-Bryn Mawr bi-co, for example).</p></li>
<li><p>Similar sized LACs a bit smaller than Carleton. Similar student bodies to one another, noticeably more preppy, jocky, and New England in personality than C-G-W. More pre-professional and conservative (in a relative sense) as well.</p></li>
<li><p>Neither school is really accessible to any large city. Boston is a weekend excursion from both. Portland (ok, small city) a day trip from Colby.</p></li>
<li><p>Amherst clearly more competitive admissions-wise and rankings-wise than Colby.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>U Chicago</p>
<p>Why is Chicago on this list? Lots of cross-applications to Carleton, admittedly, but to Colby? Amherst? Adding this to five campus-centered LACs physically removed from cities (no Mac, Barnard here) leaves me a bit confused. Happy to offer advice if this really is still something you’re considering and have specific questions.</p>
<p>You’ve visited and are still visiting. See what feels right. I do think that you need to separate the Northeast from the Midwest/West here. Very different vibes. Very different experiences to be had. </p>
<p>Good luck!</p>