I am an BME student currently going through BME senior capstone at Case. I have found this experience especially miserable.
- No technical advisers -In the EE/CE capstone class you meet with a Professor in EE or CE weekly to review your project and how the engineering work is going. They provide good feedback and suggestions on the design work being done.
-In BME you meet with the course leads (there are two) once or twice a semester. They simply do not have a good grasp on the technical challenges of your project. This design review results in mostly hand waving and discussion of human factors. The actual engineering designs are not refined by Professors. There are some TAs involved here, but generally other capstones have better technical advisers.
- Part ordering takes 4 weeks Engineering moves fast. You are stuck with the first iteration of your design since part ordering takes 4 weeks. The department does not prioritize getting your parts to you. Self-funding your parts or borrowing from friends is the best way to keep improving upon your engineering design. In my experience, buying my own parts or borrowing from friends was the only way to suceed on a reasonable timeline.
- Unmotivated peers Many students in the BME department have forsaken the art of engineering. They are getting a job in the business sphere, going on to med school, graduate school, or doing the MEM program. Or they already have a job offer and are enjoying their senior slide. Students only care about receiving an A in the class and do not value working on an engineering problem. Students have requested (to me) that they avoid doing engineering work for their capstone.
Many students optimize the engineering challenges out of the project. The 1k budget allows students to buy the instrumentation they need instead of building it.
- Projects are not impressive. Teams have spent an entire year of a Case BME capstone designing a soap dispenser that counts how many times it was used. Or a fridge that cools drugs. Or a box that dispenses medications. These are hackathon projects that have been expanded into a year long capstone since the bar for success is set low.
- Teams are chosen using an 'harmony' algorithm without accounting for student's interests or skills Students are assigned teams based on the CATME profile. Students can lose up to 30% of their grade if they are not well liked by their teammates. It's subjective.
Projects are chosen by another algorithm. Pertinent skills are disregarded. You pick your top 3 and pray. You don’t get to chose a project that aligns with your skills and interests.
- Proposing your own capstone is highly discouraged Professors told students that the last student proposed project scored low to encourage students to fall in line and use the algorithm above to be assigned a project.
- Course material is blatantly wrong. We had a lecture on the difference between standards and regulations. The lead professor said that standards, "are like guidelines and don't need to be followed." This is a poor message. The FCC standards are law. This lecture contained a picture of captain jack sparrow saying the above quote, but was quite ignorant on the value of FCC and IEEE standards to modern society.
I discussed my concerns with a track lead in the BME department, and he more or less said Design Work should be done by students on their own time. Students will only suceed as design engineers by doing work outside class, since it doesn’t really exist in our curriculum.
If you want a real capstone experience in BME I recommend avoiding this school. A poor capstone also means you will have difficulty getting a job with this degree.
If your already in, (and stuck with Case) I recommend taking a capstone from EECS or MECHE to supplement this.