Catch's SAT Journey

<p>My goal: 2350+
Preferably a 2400. We'll see how that works out. </p>

<p>A little background about me:</p>

<ul>
<li>I'm a high school junior, trying to get into a prestigious college. </li>
<li>I'm taking the PSAT in October to qualify for National Merit, just like every other ambitious junior on CC. </li>
<li>I have taken the SAT 5 times total. Once in 7th grade. Twice every year since I got to high school. (Not for fun.) </li>
<li>I would really like to get a perfect score this October so I can stop taking the SAT. </li>
</ul>

<p>A little background about my SAT skillz:</p>

<p>Highest single-sitting:
2220 (as of March 2011)
- M: 720
- CR: 710
- W: 790 (Essay 12)</p>

<p>Highest superscored:
2270
- M: 720
- CR: 760
- W: 790 (Essay 12)</p>

<p>PSAT score
208 (when I took it cold as a sophomore)
- M: 69
- CR: 69
- W: 70</p>

<p>I'll try to update this on a semi-daily basis.</p>

<p>Hopefully by the end of this journey, I will have conquered this standardized testing mountain, leaving me free to drink lemonade and play the ukelele on the other side. :)</p>

<p>IMHO, scoring well on the PSAT is significantly harder than scoring well on the SAT. </p>

<p>Why? 2/3 of the SAT is curved. You can miss a question or two on Critical Reading or Writing and still get an 800. Not so on the PSAT- with fewer questions, every one counts. </p>

<p>I think that the tricks are a bit harder, too, on the PSAT. I’m trying to hit my state cutoff score- around 220. Last year I got a 208, so I’m pretty far away- more than 10 points. That’s-what-3, 4 questions? Ay-ay-ay. </p>

<p>Guess I’m just gonna have to study.</p>

<p>I got a 2290 on a practice test today. </p>

<p>Perfect CR and W scores…but I missed 5 on math. :P</p>

<p>Btw, if anyone needs advice with their standardized testing pursuits, I can advise and help you out. (as long as it’s not math!)</p>

<p>Just ask me (or pm) :)</p>

<p>Sup catch, good stuff going on bro. Anyway, I usually get in the 2200’s. However, today, I got straight up 5 wrong in the first section of a critical reading (section 2). This seemed odd cause I usually get 2-3 wrong a section, not 5. This test felt exceptionally hard. Want to give the test a shot? I can PM you the test and answers, and you tell me if it’s harder than normal. It hella disheartened me haha, but it was wayyy hard. </p>

<p>My usual scores:
Math: 690-740
CR: 700-730
W: ~760</p>

<p>^^^ Sure, go ahead. I’ll do section 2 and tell you what I think about it.</p>

<p>@catchtwentythree what do you do to prepare for your tests? I scored pretty low on my SAT and am trying to find ways to improve for my upcoming test</p>

<p>@ TheNexus</p>

<p>Could you perhaps also send me a PM with the section? Thought it might be good to see one of the possibly harder sections.</p>

<p>@koalakitten</p>

<p>I have taken a ridiculous amount of practice tests. I’m talking hundreds of hours of practice. You know the tests offered in the Blue Book? I think I’ve taken those at least 3-4 times, each. Then I review the questions I miss, and retake until I don’t miss them anymore. I’ve also done practice tests from various study guides, but nothing comes close to real SAT stuff from CollegeBoard. </p>

<p>I memorized 500 SAT words about 3 summers ago. That was immensely helpful for the Critical Reading sections.</p>

<p>And having taken so many tests- real and practice- I’m just not daunted by it anymore. I know what the tricks are like, and where they appear in the test. If I was smarter, I’d have a perfect score by now.</p>

<p>Thanks! I’ve been taking practice tests from Barrons; however, I noticed when I was taking the diagnostic that my scores were much lower than on the actual SAT. It seems much harder than the actual test, so I’m not sure if my scores on these tests are an accurate representation of what I’ll be scoring on the SAT. Do you have any experience using Barrons?</p>

<p>^ I don’t really remember. If there’s a huge discrepancy between your Barron’s diagnostic test scores and your actual SAT scores, though, it’s probably not an accurate representation of the kinds of tests that Collegeboard manufactures.</p>

<p>Countdown until October 6th!</p>

<p>18.45 Days
or 442.73 Hours
or 26563 Minutes
or more seconds than I care to type out</p>

<p>Don’t you just love iPhone apps?</p>

<p>BTW, is anyone else taking the Oct. 2012 SAT?</p>

<p>I’m taking Oct 2012 SAT :). </p>

<p>Catch and chhallas, please check your PM. I sent you the challenging SAT.</p>

<p>Hey Nexus,</p>

<p>I just did the critical reading section. I didn’t miss any of the questions, but I’ve taken this test before. </p>

<p>And I agree- it was pretty challenging for the first section. Which 5 did you miss?</p>

<p>hi, catch23
great to hear that you scored 800 on CR and W .
I am taking SAT this october and my maths preparation is pretty great. I score 750+ in each practice test( sometimes 800 too :slight_smile: ) . But my CR’s and W’s scores are low. I believe I will manage W section , but I am really worried about the Reading section. However, I find myself improving everyday!
Can you please recommend to some books and tips ?
That would be highly appreciated .</p>

<p>^Sure!</p>

<p>Like I said, practice, practice, practice. Have you taken all of the tests in the blue book? No? Start taking them. Take the CR sections only if you’re concentrating on that aspect of the SAT. TIME YOURSELF. In fact, take off some time- if the section is 25 minutes long, give yourself 20. This will help you pace yourself on test day, when your nerves may be a little jittery. </p>

<p>The most important thing is to review after you take practice tests. Figure out why you made that mistake on vocabulary, look up the words you didn’t know, and MEMORIZE THEM IMMEDIATELY. (No, I’m serious- the words may come up again.) On reading comprehension questions, figure out why a certain passage was tricky, or why you got caught in a “trap” that the ETS laid. (They lay a TON of traps on otherwise easy questions. You will realize this the more Collegeboard practice tests you take.)</p>

<p>Read voraciously. (<- SAT word :wink: )
Seriously, though, find a list of classics, start reading them, analyze.
Repeat.</p>

<p>Catch, I was so disheartened and disappointed I threw away my answers haha. I don’t quite remember, but atleast 4/5 mistakes were from the Pasteur passage.</p>

<p>catch 23
Those are the very common tips you gave, yet very beneficial.
Thanks!
Yeah, I am practicing as much as I can.
And not to forget, I am reviewing every single question.
I will come back to you later, in case I need you !</p>

<p>Best wishes!!</p>

<p>^Thanks! :D</p>

<p>^^ TheNexus: Aww, don’t get discouraged. Here- what is your goal score for October? We can aim high together and beat this test. Seriously. </p>

<p>OK, since I don’t know which questions you got wrong, I’ll just explain a few random ones from the Pasteur section: </p>

<p>The focus of the lecture is on how Pasteur
(A) disproved an erroneous theory
(B) documented and published his experiments
(C) developed a process for killing microbes
(D) applied his findings on spontaneous generation to new problems
(E) contributed to the improvement of laboratory
research standards</p>

<p>It’s A. He disproved the erroneous-aka wrong-theory of life from spontaneous generation by proving that the growth on the broth came from bacteria, not from some magical place in the life-giving air. B- he did explain his experiments, and obviously publish and document them, but this wasn’t the focus of the lecture. The passage doesn’t even mention C, D, or E. </p>

<ol>
<li>In the lecture, Pasteur concludes that the answer to the question “Where and how did they arise?” (lines 1-2) is
(A) spontaneously
(B) from airborne bacteria
(C) from impurities in the original broth
(D) from the curved neck of a flask
(E) from a broken flask</li>
</ol>

<p>It’s not A, because that’s the very theory he was suspicious of the entire time, and eventually disproved; not C, because he boiled the impurities out of the original broth; not D or B, because the microbes don’t come from the flasks (otherwise all of the broths would be contaminated); it’s B because his experiments proved that bacteria existed in the air. </p>

<p>Pasteur’s pronouncement about preparation and chance in lines 20-23 implies that
(A) only projects that have an immediate application are important
(B) practice improves a scientist’s chances of making a significant discovery
(C) few scientists are lucky enough to devise useful theories
(D) work on projects that have no immediate application prepares scientists to exploit chance discoveries
(E) most scientific discoveries that have no immediate application are the result of good luck and timing</p>

<p>This one was tricky.
So Pasteur’s famous quote is “chance favors the prepared mind.” I eliminated A, C, and E (ask me if you want me to explain my reasoning) and was left was B and D. </p>

<p>Let’s look at B: “practice improves a scientist’s chances of making a significant discovery”</p>

<p>That might be true. After all, Pasteur does “practice” a lot by repeatedly making more and more convincing flask experiments. However, look again at the question- it asks about BOTH preparation AND chance. What does “B” say about chance? …Nothing. </p>

<p>Now let’s look at D: “work on projects that have no immediate application prepares scientists to exploit chance discoveries”</p>

<p>This is also true. What’s more, it talks about both practice and chance, and it’s supported by the passage. So the best answer (between B and D) is D.</p>

<p>Alternatively, you can take a look at this thread. Although it’s a little simplistic, it offers some useful tips. </p>

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1390501-critical-reading-analysis-right-wrong-answer-choices.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1390501-critical-reading-analysis-right-wrong-answer-choices.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>My goal score is to break 2300, but I’ll be satisfied with 2200+ :)</p>