<p>My son is a pre-junior in Industrial Design, finishing up his second year this summer. He loves the program and is doing great grade-wise, and is a hard worker as are most of the kids in ID. I’m pretty sure he’s one of the stronger students in his group. </p>
<p>The just concluded spring quarter was his first co-op quarter. However, similar to many kids in ID (and I’m told, in architecture and fashion design), he was unable to procure a coop assignment through the university. This creates an extremely awkward situation (particularly for out of state students), as the only alternatives are to go home for a quarter or stay in Cincinnati and take no more than 6 credit hours in courses outside of his major. Furthermore, the coop couselors keep you hanging on (not their fault, as they can’t create jobs out of thin air) right until the start of the next quarter. Obviously, coming home without a coop is a poor alternative, since according to the “plan” there are not supposed to be any “off” quarters; students are either supposed to be in school or satisfying their co-op requirement.</p>
<p>Our son was greatly anticipating his first co-op experience, and was extremely disappointed when nothing came through. I think he “overshot” in choosing firms to apply for, choosing primary top end consultancies in the bigger cities; however, his coop counselor reviewed his choices and did not advise him to apply anywhere else and in fact endorsed his choices. He clearly would have been better served to apply for some jobs in less glamorous cities and/or less glamorous firms, including more in-house opportunities. He was greatly disappointed by his failure to get a coop, as frankly UC’s coop program was the reason he chose to attend UC instead of going to one of the other ID schools to which he had been admitted. He chose to come home instead of stay in Cincy and take 6 credit hours, which I understood and (from a cost perspective) it made much more sense. Having said that, he still loves the program. I wrote a note to Dean Probst regarding this situation and got back a pleasant but nonresponsive response.</p>
<p>Fortunately, once he came home he was able (on his own) to secure a coop with a design firm in our hometown, not in the ID field but still valuable experience, and even got paid! UC granted coop credit, which frankly was the least they could do.</p>
<p>I understand that most of this problem is attributable to the poor state of the economy. However, I don’t see UC offering me a rebate on the pricey out of state tuition I’m paying (even with the Cincinnatus scholarship $). I’m fairly certain that UC is run like a business, particularly in these difficult times. However, it seems to be there’s a bit of bait and switch going on here; they are luring kids in with the coop program and then not delivering.</p>
<p>Has anyone heard how it went with regard to kids applying for summer coops? My suspicion is that it was difficult for these kids as well, and will continue to be so for some time until the economy gets back on more solid footing. It does not seem as though DAAP has a “Plan B” for these kids. The kids are discouraged from seeking coops on their own, yet the upperclassmen frequently advise the underclassmen to push on their own and not rely on the coop counselors.</p>
<p>Obviously the university is not advertising this situation, as it is not in their interest to do so. However, combined with the cutbacks referred to in this thread and the general lack of availability of non-need based scholarship $, I am disappointed by the current situation. Industrial design is not a career path that offers a million jobs upon graduation, and the decision to attend UC was made specifically with that in mind, in order to get a leg up (through the coop program) on obtaining permanent employment in the field. If the coop program is unable to deliver this benefit, then UC should be upfront about it.</p>
<p>I’d be interested in hearing thought of other students and parents regarding this; thanks.</p>