Choosing between two unrelated majors

I’m a first-year undergrad who’s seeking some advice regarding majors.

My dilemma involves physics. I’ve been fascinated by everything in my high school and college physics classes—especially mechanics—and find doing extra exercises, reading textbooks, surfing physics forums, etc. outside of class very natural.

However, I do not envision myself teaching or conducting research that few outside the profession might understand or benefit from. What’s more, I have not yet been formally exposed to anything particle related, so I can’t say my interest will remain as strong after I delve into the more abstract aspects of physics.

I also happen to be very interested in economics, especially behaviorism and the psychology involved. My coursework so far has been entirely conceptual, though I don’t think my interest will be dampened by the math that will surely come into play down the road.

In short, at the risk of sounding clichéd, I just love learning about how the world works. I feel like I might enjoy a career that involves, in purposely vague terms, solving practical problems, developing new ideas, or optimizing existing practices—one that would have visible effects on ordinary people.

I had originally planned to double-major, though it seems that doing so can be unnecessarily constricting, especially since my school has a fair number of core requirements. My main fear is that majoring in physics with no intention to pursue a career in academia might not be the most prudent decision, especially with econ as a viable alternative.

Other potentially relevant info: Based on my impressions thus far, I am “better” at physics than I am at econ relative to my classmates. If it makes any difference, my school is known more for econ than physics. Unfortunately, we lack an engineering major, if you were thinking about suggesting that. Any advice would be much appreciated!

One application of physics is [medical physics](AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICISTS IN MEDICINE). Medical physicists usually have a BS in physics and an MS from a medical physics program that allows them to get licensed in their state. Medical physicists are primarily involved in radiation oncology - they use nuclear medicine and radiation output to diagnose and treat people with cancer with radiation therapy. There isn’t a super-reliable source of information on average income (like the Bureau of Labor Services), but both Payscale and Glassdoor put the median salary for medical physicists around $125,000 to $130,000.

I did a quick look on a job search aggregator for other positions in my city (greater Seattle area) that ask for, or recommend, a person have a BS in physics - not necessarily exclusively physics but they at least mention it explicitly in the ad. I found product review engineer at Boeing; data engineer and business intelligence engineering at Amazon; antenna engineer and avionics radiation effects engineer at SpaceX; radiation health specialist with the U.S. Navy; revenue management associate analyst with Expedia; data scientist with Microsoft; business data analyst with Randstad; lots of other jobs with the word “engineer” in the title. And those are only the ones that specifically mentioned “bachelor’s degree in physics” in the job ad; there are scores more that will take anyone with a scientific, technological, engineering, or mathematical degree. (For example, most of Boeing’s technical positions don’t really care what your STEM major is as long as it is a STEM major, usually in the physical sciences, engineering, tech, or math/statistics).

Long story short, if you love physics, you can get a job after college with a BS in it. It’s all about the skills you develop. Make sure you take some classes in programming (which I recommend to all students in any major - it’s just a useful skill) and go heavy on the quantitative analysis classes, especially any classes that focus on statistical analysis and let you use packages/languages like SQL and R. Everyone wants their analysts to know SQL these days.

Economics is a great option, too, especially if you like math. Behavioral economics is a big field and a major in economics could lead either down the more math-heavy quantitative analyst path (especially with heavy doses of math/statistics and some programming classwork) or a consumer psychology/market research kind of path. Or both, honestly - they’re not mutually exclusive. Lots of quantitative analysts work a lot on data looking at consumer behavior.

Thanks for the input! Always good to know that there are a variety of jobs waiting.