<p>If there are other private schools with EA in your application list, you can apply to MIT and those other private schools with EA, since MIT EA is non-restrictive. This lets you get the chance of the others becoming early safeties if any gives you an EA acceptance with enough financial aid.</p>
<p>Some of the SCEA/REA schools allow EA application to any public school, but some allow it only for those in your state of residency.</p>
<p>“Only apply to non-restrictive EA schools. There is no advantage to the student at restrictive/SCEA schools - do those during RD.”</p>
<p>How is there no advantage? Is it because EA applicants are more well-rounded and pretty competitive applicants compared to those in the RD pool?</p>
<p>^Don’t know about the ‘average’ EA applicant, but those accepted in the EA round are more than ‘well-rounded and pretty competitive’, they’re exceptional. See my comments here:</p>
<p>Apply to schools that are the best “fit and match” for you. Don’t apply to schools based on admit rates, especially the schools that have any form of Early Action. Since Early Action (single choice or otherwise) is non-binding, there is no inherent advantage to the school in admitting you early. The one exception to note (based on my years of working in admissions at Ivy schools) is if you are a recruited athlete. </p>
<p>Regardless of whether you apply early action, early decision or regular decision, the single best way to increase the likelihood of admission, is to apply to a school where you can present yourself as a compelling candidate.</p>