<p>Hey guys,</p>
<p>Do you know what the curve for SAT II Physics is?</p>
<p>I've heard it's about 66 raw for 800, but then I've also heard it's 60 raw for 800.</p>
<p>Thanks a bunch.</p>
<p>the college board Real SAT II book has a raw of 63 be an 800...basically shoot for less than 10 missed and you should be alright...</p>
<p>How many steps do you think it takes for each problem-- minimum and maximum?</p>
<p>For example, if a question wants you to use an equation, do you think the numerical answer can be derived after 2 or 3 steps? (I understand the number of steps for each person will vary, but they are usually answered within a few steps of one another).</p>
<p>I hope I'm making myself clear.. I understand the way I explained it kinda sucks lol..</p>
<p>your post came outta no where, but it depends. if they ask "what did rutherford's gold foil experiment conclude" the answer is that the atom contains a tiny dense center called the nucleus.</p>
<p>But if it is a problem, for example like kinematics where u are given variables and u gotta solve for an unknown, then it could take you many steps. I like to do all the work cus when i skip steps i mess up a lot. for these problems i usually do, I guess about 5 steps, most can do it in 2-3. But do whatever is best for you.</p>
<p>Yeah, checkmate, I noticed that too. Many of the problems are very conceptual, which could make it tricky for those who learn it mostly through numbers, etc. If you can picture what is happening vector wise, then solving the problems should be a breeze. The downside is that memorizing concepts and formulas are helpful, but you need that last little thing to really clinch it.. grr..!</p>