<p>Sorry if I do this wrong in any way. This is my first post on this site.</p>
<p>I have a BA (2004) and MA (2008) in Classics from a solid Canadian university, but I am an American citizen. My undergraduate gpa was a cumulative 3.8 and of course I never scored lower than an A- in any of my graduate classes. I have an undegraduate background in Late Antique studies and a graduate background in the literature of the Late Republic. </p>
<p>I'm also in my second year of teaching Latin and Greek at a public university, from October 2009 to the present. On paper, I have 6 years of Latin and 5 years of Greek. However, it is fair to say that I have been studying or teaching Latin and Greek for 10 years, ever since I was a freshmen.
Yes, I did Intro Greek and Latin in my first year at the same time. I was nuts then. I still am. :) I also took 2 years of Italian, a year of Ancient Hebrew, 2 years of Spanish, and a year of modern standard Arabic. Languages were always my thing.
I'm currently taking German this semester to improve my chances.
I took the GRE in 2008 and my scores were poor in math, meh, around 400Q and high enough in the verbal 690V. My analytical writing score was 5.5.
I applied to Classics phds in the fall of 2008 at U of Michigan, UNC Chapel Hill, Cornell, UCSB, and U of Cincinnati. I didn't get in anywhere.
As relieved and disappointed as I was, I believe I didn't get in because I aimed too high, didn't email potential advisors, and didn't try hard enough to match my interests with certain faculty members.
I'm applying for a Classics Phd again and I'm doing things very differently. For one thing, I'm emailing everyone I'm interested in working with and providing them with a copy of my CV and a chapter of my MA thesis. I've received a lot of feedback!
I'm also not aiming as high as last time. I've decided to apply for SUNY-Buffalo, Rutgers, UCSB, and U of Washington. I also want to apply to a fifth school, but I can't make up mind as to whether it should be another mid-tier or a reach school like UPenn. </p>
<p>My problem right now is this: my BA and MA leaned heavily on Philology, but I want to move toward ancient history (Roman imperialism, Romanization, relationships with foreign peoples-think Sallust or Tacitus). I have a decent amount of historiography and I was a TA for several undergraduate ancient history courses, but I still feel as if I have to defend my decision to apply to programs offering a Classics Phd with Ancient History emphasis.</p>
<ol>
<li>Does my language background trump my only average amount of history courses?</li>
<li>Does the fact that I don't want to pursue further study on my MA thesis topic (Julius Caesar's Gallic War) create a negative impression?</li>
<li>Am I qualified to apply for universities that are higher up on the totem pole, say UPenn or Chicago? </li>
<li>What school should I apply to and why? I'm curious to see what you guys think, even if their program doesn't specifically match my interests.
Thank you for all your help!</li>
</ol>