<p>Jassy12: This is from the comments section after the article you linked to above. It explains NYU’s reasons for calling these students:</p>
<hr>
<p>This has been a wildly mischaracterized story.</p>
<p>NYU’s admissions are need-blind, meaning we do not consider a candidate’s financial resources in making an offer; however, NYU is not among that relatively small number of U.S. colleges and universities that are able to meet full need (meaning the gap between what the federal formulas say should be the family contribution and what is available in the form of financial aid). It is from these two simple truths that our effort evolved.</p>
<p>If NYU were not need-blind, there would have been no reason for us to make calls to students whose need was not fully met by financial aid: we would simply compose a class where we could be more sure of everyone’s finances. Nor would there have been a reason to make the calls if NYU could meet full need (important note here: NYU’s endowment, on a per student basis, is about 1/30 of a Harvard, Yale, or Princeton (and that’s not a typo)).</p>
<p>Here’s what NYU’s effort is all about: straightforward consumer information. Financial aid is complex, and all NYU is trying to do is make sure families know what they’re getting into and are fully aware. We called families of first generation college students because financial aid is likely to be more complex-seeming for those families who have no prior experience with it. We called those with great need because they are most likely to face the greatest challenges in this economic environment. Our intention was simply to be more transparent; we would have thought that would be worthy of praise, not criticism.</p>
<p>Moreover, we know that economics is a key reason that students don’t finish school. NYU has one of the highest percentages of Pell-eligible students among top research universities (that is, the neediest students; this is something the reporting has regrettably not noted…); we simply want the graduating class to be just as economically diverse as the entering class.</p>
<p>We wouldn’t hesitate to talk candidly with students if we thought there were academic issues that might prevent them from graduating; why wouldn’t we be as forthright about financial issues?</p>
<p>Lastly, it should be understood that this effort is not about income level, it is about need. A family with a relatively high income level may have circumstances that create great need. And in today’s economy, they may be among the most vulnerable.</p>
<p>Bottom line: we have these conversations precisely because we want these students here from the start of their pursuit of their degree to the end, and we have handled these conversations thoughtfully and sensitively because we are respectful of families’ decisions about their own finances.</p>
<p>– John Beckman, NYU Public Affairs</p>
<hr>
<p>Sounds pretty reasonable/logical to me.
Given that you are a recent graduate of the University of Washington-Seattle considering taking on significant loans for a Masters (I checked your previous posts), I’m curious what your beef with NYU is.</p>