<p>"I don't know whether the teacher also expected Jazmine to correct the grammar and spelling, but here is a sample of the letter's prose: "Jazmine is enlightened by the journey of academia the twist, turns and heights elevated to farthest stretch imagined. Jazmine will bring a willingness to work, thought provoking, openess and challenges of the worlds positive attributes. . . . Jazmine has shared with her peers & cohorts her beliefs of academia and the wherewithal to never give up to keep trying, to keep learning and to always keep growing."</p>
<p>At least Jazmine had the letter. She had another one, too, from another teacher, but it was barely a paragraph. Then the guidance counselor failed to send Jazmine's midyear grades to two of the schools she applied to.</p>
<p>Is this any way to get into college? Of course not, but it is far too typical of the way the process goes at too many urban schools. Last week the Chronicle of Higher Education released a study showing that the proportion of low-income students (whose families, like Jazmine's, had incomes of less than $40,000) at the nation's top colleges actually declined in the past couple of years. The drop has been seen by educators as particularly disappointing in light of the fact that many colleges have recently started using endowment income to offer free tuition to poor families.</p>
<p>But what stands between disadvantaged kids and college is not mere money. It is orderliness, attentive mentoring and simple organizational guidance. Public schools used to be the great equalizer in America -- the institutions that allowed the children of immigrants and the descendants of slaves to become fluent in the English language and prepare them for careers. In too many urban areas, they don't perform such basic educational functions. But they don't offer structured environments, either, for the few students who are trying to lift themselves up and get a better educational experience at college.</p>
<p>Before they can even apply for college, kids need a real high-school education, complete with literate, motivated teachers."</p>
<p>None of that is new to me since I have volunteered extensively in schools and have served on regional and national scholarship committees.</p>
<p>What was in the story was also why I scoff at people who somehow think that poor kids have it easier when they apply to college. The routine things that students who are middle and upper class take for granted -- literate teachers with good grammar; GCs who know the ropes about college admissions and scholarships, assist students, and are reliable about getting paperwork in; teachers and GCs who know how to write recommendation letters; teachers who are teaching the subjects that they were trained to teach -- all of these things are scare at schools populated by lots of low income students.</p>
<p>These concerns affect more than the students' being able to apply to college. These concerns also mean that the students -- even vals with straight As -- lack the academic background to not only do at the average level on college boards (When I lived in Detroit, the average ACT score for seniors there was a 12. A guidance counselor told one of my mentees-- who'd gotten a 14 -- not to bother retaking the test because she had done "well."), they lack the academic prep to pass at most first and second tier colleges.</p>
<p>I remember students who were taking and getting As in AP English in a competitive public h.s. in Detroit who didn't know basic rules of grammar such as adding "ed" endings to make the past tense. Such students thought it was normal that most students weren't able to get more than 2s on the AP tests.</p>
<p>Makes my blood boil to think of students who are doing the best that they can who through no fault of their own lack the skills for options that would match their intelligence and motivation.</p>