They do not provide any data on the population of students who were surveyed. They surveyed 1,000 students online, across 10 “fields” which are, in fact, made up of disparate subfields. Were the students at publics universities, expensive private universities, where in the country were the universities attended by these students? The students themselves, were they from wealthy families, poor families, East Coast, the SE, etc.
Also, how were the questions written? The wat=y questions are written can determine what the answers ill be.
So I call BS, because so many things can affect these results, and there are so many confusing factors that they are meaningless. Unless I see the questionnaire and know who the students were, not to mention how were these 1,000 selected. After all, there s no way to get exactly 1,000 respondents.
Every bit of this “research” is opaque.
Seems to have been commissioned by a bunch of Boomers to “prove” that “young people today” (they probably called theme “Millennials”) don’t want to work, are lazy, etc.
Here is a simple an great rule for studies. If it clearly and strongly conforms to the bias held by any specific group, especially one which as a lot of wealth or power, it is probably unreliable, to say the ;east. If they refuse to show their methodology, I conclude that it’s trash.
This meets the criteria for being trash.