<p>Garland, I'm not scolding anyone, just reflecting aloud on the public policy implications of this. </p>
<p>I have a child attending college in MA from out-of-state, and I can sympathize with the inconveniences of jury duty, whether in one state or two. Certainly there have been times in my life when jury duty would have been very difficult, in one state, let alone two. </p>
<p>If my child is called to jury duty, I would hope that she could work out details so that it isn't unduly burdensome. Ideally, it should be an educational and uplifting experience, but I know the reality doesn't always work that way!</p>
<p>The bottom line is that there is no practical way to ensure that everyone has exactly the same burden of jury service. Inequality is inherent in the system--there are short trials and long trials, emotionally difficult trials and more routine civil trials. There are limits to the extent to which the burdens of jury service can be perfectly evenly distributed.</p>
<p>Having 50 different state systems does cause considerable practical difficulties and inefficiencies (as well as blessings of diversity and natural experiments.)</p>
<p>It's common for people to have to file multiple income returns if they earn income in different states. The good news is that they can get a credit against their tax liability in their home state for taxes owed to other states where they earned income. </p>
<p>The bad news is that this system causes a lot of paperwork and bureaucratic hassle. (It's sometimes referred to as the "jock tax" because professional athletes are required to pay taxes on their prorated income from every state in which they play. This also applies to the lower-paid team employees who travel with the team, e.g., trainers and other support staff.)</p>
<p>In principle, I could imagine a parallel formal system in which a college student who served in his college town would get an exemption from further service that would be honored in his home state as well as the college state for the next few years. (And vice versa--if the student had recently served in his home state, his exemption certificate could apply in the new state.)</p>
<p>If I were a judge in the home state, I would certainly be sympathetic to a student who had such a certificate and who wrote to me explaining that there would be a significant double burden involved in serving a second time.</p>
<p>The same situation comes up when people who are not college students move from one state to another. You could have just done your jury duty in one state when you move to a new one. </p>
<p>The new state is under no legal obligation to honor your exemption in your old state, but if I were a judge or court official, I would be inclined to be sympathetic, at least in the case of someone who wrote that they had had a signficant burden in their last jury tour.</p>
<p>(Many jury tours are minimally burdensome. In our state, jury service means being "on call" for a week, but most called for jury duty don't even have to physically report. They just call a special phone number every evening to see if they must report the following day. If they do have to report, it's one day or one trial, and they are excused. In my last tour of duty, I called in on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. Each time I was informed that I was not needed the next day and on Wednesday, I was informed that I was not needed at all and would be mailed a certiifcate exempting me from service for the next three years. If I had moved out of state immediately afterwards, I wouldn't have expected an out-of-state judge to be too sympathetic to my request to honor my exemption in the new state. However, if I'd been impaneled on a jury that had served for several days and had significant burdens of serving, I would expect a more sympathetic hearing to my request for the exemption to carry over in my new state.)</p>
<p>The state and local jurisdictions of Massachusetts do a lot for college students, even those in private colleges like BU. BU students live in dorms and attend classes in buildings that are exempt from property tax and their meals are exempt from sales tax. Despite this tax-exemption they receive municipal services like police and fire department, etc. Private colleges can raise money to build new buildings by issuing tax-exempt bonds under the authority of state-established bond-issuing entities. Massachusetts offers subsidized loans to parents of all students attending MA colleges, regardless of where the student and parents claim residency. I don't think requiring jury service from out-of-state students is an unreasonable burden, given that they do benefit from the criminal and civil justice systems of the state.</p>