<p>I’m always curious to find why students limit themselves (or strongly prefer) colleges with an open curriculum. I can understand looking for places with fewer restrictions or more freedom in selecting courses, but only a completely open curriculum? The whole idea behind a liberal arts education is breadth, knowledge in a variety of fields.*</p>
<p>Even with that said, though, most distribution requirements are pretty broad. There’s a lot of freedom within a broad distribution.</p>
<p>Anyway, here are a list of small colleges, mostly LACs, which claim to meet full need that may be a good fit for you in the Northeast. I’m not sure about the open curriculum thing at any of them, though:</p>
<p>College of the Holy Cross (reachish)
Gettysburg College ¶
Trinity College (CT, may be reachish)</p>
<p>And here are some other small colleges in the Northeast that are good, ranked places that you may be interested in, but </p>
<p>Lafayette College ¶
Connecticut College
Union College (NY)
Skidmore College (NY)
Franklin & Marshall College ¶
St. Lawrence University (NY)
Hobart & William Smith Colleges (NY)
Wheaton College (MA)
Muhlenberg College ¶
Ursinus College ¶
Allegheny College ¶
College of the Atlantic (ME)
St. Michael’s College (VT)
Washington & Jefferson College ¶
Washington College (MD)
Bennington College (VT)
Drew University (NJ)
Juniata College ¶
Stonehill College (MA)
Hampden-Sydney College (VA)
Goucher College (MD)
Hampshire College (MA)
Randolph College (VA)
Siena College (NY)
Berry College (GA)
Susquehanna University ¶
Westminster College ¶
Gordon College (MA)
St. Anselm College (NH)
Wells College (NY)
Houghton College (NY)
Moravian College ¶
St. Vincent College ¶
Lycoming College ¶
Hartwick College (NY)
Albright College ¶</p>
<p>Regional:
Elmira College (NY)
Merrimack College (MA)
Seton Hill University ¶
Champlain College (VT)
Cazenovia College (NY)
Geneva College ¶
Lasell College (MA)
St. Francis College (NY)
Thiel College ¶
Concordia College (NY)</p>
<p><em>I fundamentally disagree with the Open Jar’s statements about gen ed requirements, particularly that they create “artificial islands”. The whole *point</em> of general education requirements is to teach students about how the liberal arts are interconnected, and require one another, and how all are needed in a nuanced understanding of our world and to participate as a democratic citizen. Moreover, they claim that the subjects liberal arts require “lose relevance” with every passing year and that’s patently untrue. First of all, colleges are always reevaluating their curricula and updating them, and secondly - when is biology, or philosophy, or drama or political science ever going to lose relevance as long as there are humans on this planet?</p>