Columbia or Stanford?

<p>I said a relative, I do not believe I specified the relation. The issue Mr. Brown is that you post negatively about Columbia in as many threads as your negativity can be inserted, not simply in threads that compare and contrast Columbia and Stanford. It is the obsession with spreading negativity about Columbia, whenever you see an opportunity to do so, that raises the question of balance in your life. With your credential from Stanford your expertise might be invaluable on the Stanford thread! Why not spread the POSITIVE message of Stanford at the Standford threads and just let Columbia go, since by your own admission it is beneath your contempt? Since Columbia is clearly beneath you, why continue to elevate it by your constant attentions? Your information about Columbia is patently false, anyway, and the need to spread misinformation in as many threads as you can seems an “unreasonable” use of the time of such a highly credentialed individual as yourself. To this observer, your obsession with Columbia seems not particularly healthy since it has no rational basis in a connection of any sort whatsoever. And it seems perverse to spend as much time as you do heaping negativity on persons clearly decades younger than you are. Perhaps with adults your own chronological age this could be a healthy exercise. It is the audience you have selected for your rants that makes your obsession problematic. </p>

<p>If you are so inclined, publish the definitive book revealing the TRUTH about Columbia. Let it be vetted in the public domain. Use the tool of an editorially legitimate book to generate for yourself a more appropriate audience and a critical dialogue. As it stands, for the most part your behavior in this forum seems rather contemptible, given the target audience and specific purpose.</p>

<p>^^^ha!</p>

<p>Good one.</p>

<p>There is a poster that has been posting nothing but false statements about columbia yet you attack the person that stands uo to correct those false statements. </p>

<p>Again - good one!</p>

<p>Swingtime there is a reason why out of the several hundred cross admits between Stanford and Columbia per year less than 12 students choose to attend Columbia.</p>

<p>^
THere are absolutely NO Stanford undergraduate alumi who are currently at top CEO position at top 10 Silicon Valley firm. Why ?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>well thanks for the info</p>

<p>the only problem here is that NO ONE stated that “Stanford undergraduates dominate at the CEO levels of the top Silicon Valley firms” as your are claiming</p>

<p>thanks anyway</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>sorry, but I NEVER said that I received and undergraduate degree from Stanford</p>

<p>good try though</p>

<p>I also got into both Columbia and Stanford. And I am going to Columbia this year!</p>

<p>Mr. Brown,</p>

<p>The sad part is that you sound very un-educated for someone who apparently had a degree at such a good school. </p>

<p>All you do is post negative statements and nothing else that is useful.</p>