<p>this article talks about how vermont kids were outraged that they were waitlisted while so many oos applicants got accepted...but i don't understand...if the non-resident is a better applicant then why should the in-stater complain?</p>
<p>^^because the obligation of the public university is to educate the residents of their own state first AND because residents of Vermont pay taxes to finance the Vermont public school system.</p>
<p>73% PERCENT OF VERMONT IS OUT-OF-STATE STUDENTS. I don’t see how you can prove that Vermont is putting its in-state residents first by those statistics.</p>
<p>I understand that you want to have the best university possible and to do that you have to have the best students but having the best students overall is not the primary obligation of a public university.</p>
<p>Publics need to be VERY careful that they aren’t perceived as taking too many OOS kids over instate kids. Some states even put limits on how many OOS students can be accepted.</p>
<p>If a school wants to improve its profile, while also accepting its own residents, then it has to significantly grow enrollment. (such as taking an additional 2 OOS students for every lower stats instate student.) It can’t keep a stagnate enrollment, raise its profile, and not end up excluding its own state’s students.</p>
<p>Yes, many states have to dedicate at least 50% or so of their state’s entire budget for K-12 education. That doesn’t leave much for the many other state budget items. Higher education gets whatever is left.</p>
<p>Ain’t that the truth… the state legislatures all think they can have their cake and eat it too. Either fund most of the budget of a school or don’t shackle them to take 95% of their students from in-state.</p>