<p>Cornell will offer more courses, more majors, more areas of study, more advanced level courses, more fellow students with quite varied interests. Amherst will have much smaller classes and a more initimate environment.</p>
<p>By varied interests, a significant difference is 100% of Amherst students are studying in Arts & sciences subjects, while only 1/3 of Cornell’s students are.
With seven different undergraduate colleges, there are many different types of people and fields of study at Cornell. They will all be in your dorm. Some people may prefer the expanded opportunities this diversity affords, others may prefer more homogeneity.</p>
<p>If it were me, if I were a guy, I might look very closely at Amherst, because it offers the traditional LAC advantages (eg smaller classes) with the 5 college system to mitigate, in some measure, some of the traditional disadvantages (eg fewer courses, fewer and less of everything). Though I believe the mitigation is imperfect, due to travel time between campuses and no top graduate programs, the situation there still seems potentially much better to me than the typical stand-alone LAC. </p>
<p>But I would only strongly consider it if I felt certain that I fit very well with the predominant campus culture there. Because my D1 found that she didn’t, at her LAC, and it became an issue for her socially. And that school is larger than Amherst.</p>
<p>Socially, Amherst students have posted statements such as the following:</p>
<p>“…significant number of Smith and Mount Holyoke students taking the bus over every weekend. Long story short, if you are seeking a girl, the odds are definitely tipped in your favor”.</p>
<p>While that guy seemed enthused about it, frankly it didn’t sound as great to D2 when she was considering colleges to transfer to.</p>
<p>She is currently studying Humanities at Cornell, likes it there, and is happy with the size and content of her courses, in the path she has chosen. She is actually having a great experience there, academically and socially.</p>
<p>Biology is a research powerhouse there, but it is a big major, there may be many opportunities and choices within it but also many students. Certainly it will be of a different magnitude than Amherst, in both a good way and possibly in a bad way as well.</p>
<p>Cornell just built a brand new biology mega-facility, while if I’m not mistaken I think I’ve read Amherst’s biology facilities are in need of refurbishment, yet a replacement was deferred due to finances. You might check on this, if you care. They would not be close to comparable anyway. But how much this would matter to you might depend on what you wind up wanting to do there.</p>
<p>The intro classes at the university will probably often be big lectures with recitation sections, clearly a less personal form of instruction, though not necessarily less effective. Actually one such course is one of the most beloved courses on campus. But it is not Biology. I personally did not care for those huge lecture courses as an underclassman, but I was happy to have such a large array of advanced level courses to choose from in my upperclass years.</p>
<p>None of my kids looked into JHU.</p>
<p>I would not choose a school I hadn’t visited.</p>