<p>The question in #17 IS simple. [And is different than #11].</p>
<p>The answer may vary as widely as there are different hiring managers, with different opinions.</p>
<p>In general, hiring managers want to hire the best candidate for the job. They usually don’t care specifically where an applicant went to college, per se. But they do have an interest in being able to make an assessment about that portion of the applicant’s credentials. Particularly for new hires with little experience, a hiring manager would prefer to be able to put a candidate’s undergrad performance in context with that of the other candidates.</p>
<p>The challenge is, here in the US there is not ubiquitous familiarity with Indian universities and their quality, admissions standards and grading practices.</p>
<p>If you are graduating from an IIT, and are interviewing for a top firm that regularly employs IIT grads, you can expect that your credentials will be fairly assessed. IMO.</p>
<p>If you are graduating from an Indian university of little international reknown, and are interviewing at a firm that does not hire tons of India-educated people, it may be a challenge for them to accurately evaluate your educational accomplishments. In that case, the manager may make assumptions. </p>
<p>However IMO these assumptions could possibly be to your benefit rather than to your detriment. For example, since they are familiar with a given local US university, a manager may well know that lots of idiots go there, That may well be the case at your U in India too, but the manager may have heard all these stories of single-digit admissions and assume that the standards at your U were actually higher than at that US school. Whether or not that’s actually the case.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, applicant comparisons are rarely limited just to school A vs. international school B, there’s more to it than that. And people with degrees from foreign universities are well represented in the US workplace.</p>