<p>I don't understand the way people behave on this board. Because I don't think I received good or excellent advising, doesn't mean I want to be told "exactly what majors/courses are right for me" or that I expect an advisor to "tell me what I am interested in." These aren't explicitly directed at me, but it follows. </p>
<p>And also, what is with this "X is there, you just have to seek it out" line that occurs over and over on the Rice board but not on others? I am fully aware that advice is given to students. I am interested in whether it is good or bad, or harder or easier to get than I think it should be. </p>
<p>That said, there is a real, legitimate problem about the best way to pick a major. Everyone has an opinion. Taking intro courses in my opinion is basically the default. It requires no advice, and is basically the slowest way one could go about it. I can find the intros by the course schedules. </p>
<p>One mistake I see advisers make, though, is overemphasis on broad interest and perceived job possibilities. Those things are important, but are probably the most imprecise and variable factors.</p>
<p>Professor quality is more important to students than advisers realize. Pretty much any student will tell you when a professor sucks, but an adviser never will. Advisers certainly won't steer you away from a department because they believe it has bad teaching--that would be antithetical to their pro-Rice spirit--though that is perfectly legitimate. It seems quite common for people to switch majors because of professors, either from bad or to good. </p>
<p>In fact, advisers of any type probably don't know how good a given department is at teaching. To me, that is the most important. I am willing to learn anything from a good teacher, and since advisers don't tell me who those teachers are, they fail me. The best hope is the course reviews, which granted are Rice's doing. One might argue that someone could ask students, but the logistics of that are not good. There are many students, and the majors of your friends might not turn out to be useful. Concentration of information, whether it is stuffed inside a person called an adviser, published in course reviews, or talked about on this forum, is the whole point. </p>
<p>My ideal adviser would be a student who has been at Rice for like 9 years. The academic advisers are very different from that. Major advisers simply vary too much, but are generally too concerned with their own department to help out an undecided person. What I look for in an adviser as I have described may not what other students care about. I don't see how masters or RAs can help me, for example, unless they happen to be in the department I want to know about, which is not likely.</p>