<p>
[quote]
nah mellamokiwi , it was beneficial and something else becausee in passage 1 it said that the placard said the scientists weren't sure if it was true or something along those lines, which is exactly what the critic liked.. she wanted to expose people to the process behind science, not just the ends results
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I am backing that. She wanted the back rooms to come out on showcase. She'd love it!</p>
<p>was one of the answers "graphic violence"?
i think the lines read children were ironists or whatever...
this question also had "feminine/masculinity" as another choice</p>
<p>to what did the indian computer programmer/writer attribute his surprise to find that his writing could be taken in different ways? his inexperienceee ?</p>
<p>I am sure that I did not put graphic violence for anything. I think I put made them think of media as something to throw away or something for that one</p>
<p>wait can someone explain one more time why it was deff pertinent observations? i'm still sticking behind my choice of further explanation..i don't get the Twain observation thing</p>