<p>ya i had exp CR too...i think the exp was the section that had the passage about the black girl at a concert right?</p>
<p>Maybe if Zuben wasn't some bs.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Critical Reading is more like:
-10 = 800
-13 = 790
-15 = 780
[/quote]
</p>
<p>***?
the most you can miss for a 800 is like 3. o_o not 10</p>
<p>Nah. More like.. bitter resentment. But the CR today was just ridiculous. And the fact that I had exper-CR, it was hell on earth.</p>
<p>nah, i thought it was rather easy</p>
<p>o.0
why are different people posting the same exacting thing over and over again?
LOL</p>
<p>anyways I concur with -10 for 800...who else wants to barricade the collegeboard with me!</p>
<p>All i wish is that Math is lenient. I couldn't get two hard one's and panicked the rest of the test. Hopefully its just -2 and that's still 760+ right?</p>
<p>
[quote]
All i wish is that Math is lenient. I couldn't get two hard one's and panicked the rest of the test. Hopefully its just -2 and that's still 760+ right?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>That's exactly what happened to me! I like to start with the hard ones to get them out of the way, but that backfired on me a bit today. Looking back, the questions weren't that hard, but I panicked. I believe 760 is at the higher end of the range for -2.</p>
<p>Zuben should accidentally get lost from all the tests and just not be graded....</p>
<p>Math was wicked **** easy...
-1 780
-2 750
-3 730
-4 720
-5 700</p>
<p>CR was not easy when we got to section 8/9...
-3 800
-5 790
-6 770</p>
<p>Writing is up in the air...but its probably not an amazingly lenient curve...
-1 80
-2 79
-3 78
-4 76</p>
<p>There seems to be no real consensus about which sections were easy/hard. I think we'll just have to wait 'til April 7...</p>
<p>Yeah i guess so, I'm just hoping my Reading and CR will compensate for my math (Usually its other way around). Still hoping the 2300 is tangible.</p>
<p>I think that the general consensus is that there were a couple of tricky math problems for many people, but not enough to throw the curve off, since the rest of the math for the majority of people was easy. For CR, some of the SC questions in the later two sections were challenging, and the last reading passage was very dense. Therefore, CR should probably have a lenient curve, but I am not sure about the curve compared to January (I did not take it then). For writing, that seems to be up in the air. I think, again like with math, there were several questions that were somewhat tricky, but not enough to really throw off the MC curve that much. Probably -1 for W, 0 for M, and -3 for CR.</p>
<p>By the way, I do not think that they'd do -4 or more unless the section was truly uberly evil.</p>
<p>
[quote]
By the way, I do not think that they'd do -4 or more unless the section was truly uberly evil.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>The devil himself wrote all of the CR sections.</p>
<p>I thought the math SAT was extremely difficult, because of how confusingly worded so many problems were. The CR was a little bit more difficult than usual, with a lot more guessing. Writing was around normal. This is going to be retarded if my math goes way down and if my critical reading goes way up..</p>
<p>^ That's what I'm afraid will happen with me. I don't have any confirmed CR wrong, although there's a lot of debate on a number of questions. For the most part the CR flew by pretty smoothly for me. I don't understand why everyone is hating on Zuben so much - I thought that passage was fun and interesting.</p>
<p>For me:</p>
<p>Reading was easy, the answers were all very clear if you read thoroughly.<br>
Math was easy, I misread and misinterpreted two problems though.
Writing was average, I got a ton of E's though, which is frustrating.</p>
<p>^Yepp, i second 112358<-- haha you sound like a robot.</p>
<p>^Haha. I wish I was an SAT robot...</p>
<p>me tooo =[
I wish I was one of those 2400 robots who pwn the SAT. oh well.</p>