<p>Catria, re your earlier comment, yes, I was referring to Ontario’s U-level courses, which are uniformly u-prep curriculae. As you noted yourself, Quebec’s CEGEP system also contains a university-level prep that as you pointed out, perhaps more closely matches university rigor
Britain’s O-levels are indeed a better example of the phenomenon I’m trying to describe, which is that of a quantifiable national u-prep curriculum.</p>
<p>My point about APs is that from what I’ve witnessed in the US in terms of unequal funding across districts even in the same state and dramatic disparity in delivery quality, APs at least offer access to a form of standardized curriculae to school districts who might otherwise devote all their scarce funding to instead serving the mid range or failing population that represents the majority and further “ignore” it’s most academically talented kids. </p>
<p>The difference is that it’s prepared by a separate, self-financing entity that of course seems interested in sustaining itself, and ergo keeps broadening the pool, instead of having the funds we pay in taxes for education used to develop a uniform advanced curriculum.</p>
<p>So it’s a blessing and a curse because offering APs gives a district the opportunity to appear to cater to advanced students (and a mechanism by which to tell if its teachers are delivery the material or at least covering it via the test scores) but the ubiquity of AP also means ultimately it could and perhaps has been curricularly diluted, though its existence prevents states from developing truly standard advanced curriculums and in service.</p>
<p>To give you an example: my son attended a public GT magnet program that was known for its inter-disciplinary approach to humanities study. All of its classes were viewed by colleges familiar with the program to be honors/prep/advanced. Then a generous funder supplied the opportunity for the school to move toward IB accreditation. During the process, the school first implemented AP (to much parental outcry, since that meant no longer pairing/crossing disciplines in delivery structure.) Ostensibly, it did so to ready all staff equally for the imminent transition, and in the interim, still provide students with “advanced” curriculum to demonstrate talent to colleges. The school is now an accredited IB program, which more closely matches its original inter-disciplinary emphasis.</p>
<p>In this case, the curse part of AP was simply that for a while, it had to trump the unique, rigorous and preferred original interdisciplinary curriculum – much more teaching to the test.</p>
<p>But in a cash-strapped public school district, it is difficult to fund gt programs adequately without rancor, it appears, and even more difficult to in-service the teachers and type of delivery quality produced, because other board-and-union-inspired shenanigans can get in the way.</p>
<p>Nothing short of a national, standardized university prep curriculum would come close to communicating readiness to rigorous colleges as well as AP exam results can, and with rampant grade inflation and such a disparity in quality among districts and states, I would suggest that AP is therefore useful, when triangulated with SAT and GPA, rank and school reputation to assess a student’s preparedness.</p>
<p>That said, I’ve always been of the mind that I’d prefer my son was taught college material by college professors, and felt the “save money” rep of AP was more just a way to sell it to parents My greater concern was for students to leave high school without knowledge or habit gaps that would hurt them at the university level, and I’m not clear that really happens if everybody is scrambling to get college credit in high school </p>
<p>But at rigorous schools, even other college courses should probably be scrutinized. Eg as a dual enrolled student in HS, my son had an A in a subject taken at a local four year university that transferred for general credit but did not fulfill his grad requirement. Good thing too, because he actually had to work his tail ff just to pass the equivalent class at his university now, and it was the foundation of a sequence he might not have mastered had he been allowed to skip it due to the university credit ;)</p>
<p>I like the idea of rewarding credit for AP after successful completion of the next corse in the sequence! Great common-sense answer to what is otherwise a conundrum.</p>