<p>neighboring allies (China, S. Korea, Japan)</p>
<p>"Allies?" hah!</p>
<p>I meant to say "could turn them into ruin."</p>
<p>And I never stated that bombing a country is an effective measure in these cases. I said you're fooling yourself if you think a country isn't scared of our potential power against them.</p>
<p>I think we all got what you were trying to say. it is unwise to underestimate the potential of other countries. No wonder why there were so many casualties in Iraq.</p>
<p>Also, EU has the potential of harming us economically. there is no proof whatsoever that "countries would be scared if America gave an ulimatum"</p>
<p>the situation with Korea and Iran verifies this.</p>
<p>i really wanted to talk about Bush's environmental policies. As the campaign activist for Environmental Defense, I know pretty much about it.</p>
<p>Too bad Bush doesnt have a good reputation when it comes to preserving the environment.</p>
<p>neighboring allies (China, S. Korea, Japan)
"Allies?" hah!"</p>
<p>The enemy of my enemy is my friend...Russia is also a good ally against N. Korea.</p>
<p>"Too bad Bush doesnt have a good reputation when it comes to preserving the environment."</p>
<p>Hey if i want to ride my dirtbikes i think i should be allowed to. Kerry would have outlawed them.</p>
<p>"Hey if i want to ride my dirtbikes i think i should be allowed to. Kerry would have outlawed them."</p>
<p>Hey, if I want to rob someone, I think I should be allowed to.
Great logic</p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>neighboring allies (China, S. Korea, Japan)<<</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>Agree. Earlier or later they will BE allies.</p>
<p>haha, tennistennis, you're the one with the sparse sense of logic. How does dirt biking parallel to stealing.</p>
<p>You've obviously missed my point.
Though stealing and robbing are different, just becuase someone wants to do sometihng, dosn't mean that its in the best interest of everything that he/she does it.
Get it?
And I love how all teh conservatives aren't even attempting to defend Dubya on his environmental record.</p>
<p>tennistennis, they wouldnt DARE to defend Dubya when i know almost all of his activities regarding environmental defense. I am the campaign activist for Environmental Defense, and so their knowledge on this topic cannot surpass mine.</p>
<p>I would really admire them if they tried.LOL</p>
<p>Dubya doesn't have good enviromental records, but the enviromental issues weren't started by him. The ozone layer hasn't started depleting just because he became president, and he wasn't the first one to cut down forests ect. It's a very big problem that may not even be solved over the course of a century let alone four years. I think that any progress is commendable. It's just like in France a few centuries back. Louis XVI wasn't the worst king, he was just the most unfortunate one who had inherited an emormous debt to be paid. It was really his predecessor, Louis XV's fault.</p>
<p>So are you saying Bush is innocent when it comes to the environment? Don't get me there. hehe</p>
<p>Give me your views on what Bush specifically did wrong in relation to the environment and what you feel he didn't do. I'll give you my unbiased opinions on them. I'm a conservative, but I support environmental conservation. As intoxicated said, Bush's record is not good, but I think what you're going to show is going to be blatantly exaggerated. Let's just set the record straight...</p>
<p>I am going to give you a long description on Bush's environmental policy. It might take me some time to summarize everything. I will post my views tomorrow night. </p>
<p>"As intoxicated said, Bush's record is not good, but I think what you're going to show is going to be blatantly exaggerated"</p>
<p>So your posts arent biased? hah!! Just look at you posts on Abu Ghraib!</p>
<p>Even when I post a completely reasonable, information-oriented reply, you still can't resist throwing in one of your stupid little comments.</p>
<p>Even when I post a completely reasonable, information-oriented reply, you still can't resist throwing in one of your stupid little comments.</p>
<p>If you ever gave me an argument under the above description, then i would have agreed with you all the way. All your posts are just based on your personal views, and most of it cannot be supported. this is a debate. So only arguments supported by sourcec apply here.</p>
<p>Wow that post above made no sense at all. Are you saying he has to PROVE that your being an a**?!?!?</p>
<p>Go work on your environmental propaganda so i can tear it to pieces you moron...</p>
<p>Wow that post above made no sense at all. Are you saying he has to PROVE that your being an a**?!?!?</p>
<p>As far as Elcommando goes all you are doing i making personal attacks. I dont care what you say because nothing you say relates to this debate.</p>
<p>Go work on your environmental propaganda so i can tear it to pieces you moron...</p>
<p>I thought you were sick of name calling. Seems like you are the one creating all the trouble.</p>