<p>so what does that mean?.....if u had that seciton and that was not ur experiemental and i had that section and i had two grid-ins...that means that the one we both had is definitely not the experimental?.....i don't know what i just said...but hopefully some of u do...</p>
<p>Yeah, so the other grid-in section was experimental.
unless my memory has completely failed me... hopefully not.
but I'm pretty sure I did not have 2 grid-ins</p>
<p>damn it...then was the last question of that section about some cone thingy...cuz ididn't have time to finish that section.....</p>
<p>all I know is that section 9 is not experimental because other people also had section 9 and 2 grid-in sections.</p>
<p>the answer is not 92, its 29
they asked for n
n= 29
once n digits are reversed and are 63 greater than n
then it = 92</p>
<p>Korean guy!! i got 0 too are we just dumb? the question was like this<br>
10</p>
<hr>
<p>|x-y|</p>
<p>0<x<5 -5<Y<0 cept! those(<) should have lines under them which if im right means we are right</p>
<p>On the reading one, what did you people put down for "what would the author of passage 2 say about the claim at the end of passage 1"? It was something about reading decline making us lose skills necessary for democracy.</p>
<p>I said he would say people were informed enough to not suffer from this, which I think was C.</p>
<p>I don't remember the other answer choices, but I don't think that's what I put.</p>
<p>did anyone get two questions in a grid in math</p>
<p>first question was w is k decreased by 36% of k
what is ratio of sqr root w to sqr root k</p>
<p>and then a question with a circle inscribed in a square inscribed in a circle inscribed in a square inscribed in a circle.
and the outside circle is 6000 square inches, radius of inside circle. </p>
<p>answers?</p>
<p>Piterbizon, I didn't put that.
Sorry, I can't remember the other choices either.</p>
<p>The other ones were "This is one of the first "crisis" reports", which I considered, and some other stuff which I think was pretty much irrelevant...</p>
<p>does anyone remeber the question about "full-bodied"</p>
<p>I think some of the choices were complete and evocative and (LMAO) tasty.
None of them really seemed correct.</p>
<p>I hope they curve nicely =]</p>
<p>omg that full bodied one was weird. i put complete i think. they were all so random</p>
<p>Hm did anyone get "alarmist" as an attitude for the one about reading going to hell</p>
<p>yes...alarmist.</p>
<p>I think it had to be either complete or evocative, although neither really works.</p>
<p>yes...alarmist.</p>
<p>I think it had to be either complete or evocative, although neither really works.</p>
<p>yes...alarmist.</p>
<p>I think it had to be either complete or evocative, although neither really works.</p>
<p>What was the writer of the liberal/conservative passage suggesting at the end?
A) revolutionize the political system
B) ?
C) ?
D) Tell families to take as much time on politics as they do as their kids
E) something random about citizenship</p>
<p>I got D, but I think I did pretty bad in the CR as a whole</p>