<p>none of mine are wrong, tell me which one is wrong and i will give you a detailed explanation of it</p>
<p>"Plesy vs Ferguson? slaves not citizens"</p>
<p>lol</p>
<p>separate but equal...
I put the wrong one, sorry chickla, I bet you are just a genious</p>
<p>What happened after Roanoke? Didnt colonize for 100 years
I think thats wrong. Roanoke was 1584... They colonized in Jamestown 1607.
Why civil rights? blacks fought in WWII
Enlightenment-increased church attendance
I dont think thats rights...I dont remember what the other choices were tho..
can someone clarify these? what were the exact questions and answers.
Redisctricting 1920-1960? more living in suburbs
AFL? did not gain support of government
Thomas and Hamilton? Something aristocracy?????????help on this one</p>
<p>enlightenment was the religious movement, what else would it be?</p>
<p>i think i aced this</p>
<p>i thought enlightenment was the one about natural rights?
as for civil rights..i think i got something else too</p>
<p>from wikipedia: "The era is marked politically by governmental consolidation, nation creation, greater rights for the common people, and a decline in the influence of authoritarian institutions such as the nobility and Church."</p>
<p>"Redisctricting 1920-1960? more living in suburbs"</p>
<p>Can someone verify this...The question said "1900-1960"... But not many people lived in suburbs prior to WWI, right? Who else thought it was the one about farms?</p>
<p>I can't get the entire article but here is the Google blurb:
"Similarly, the rural areas are over- represented in the process of .... takes away from the legislature all power over reappor- tionment and redistricting. ..."</p>
<p>ya the enlightenment one has something to do with natural rights</p>
<p>for the civil rights one i remember putting something about optimism but i don't think that's right</p>
<p>^ yeah thats the one i put too. Probably wrong though :/</p>
<p>I left about 15 blank and guessed maybe 8-10</p>
<p>is that bad?</p>
<p>kinda right?</p>
<p>i put optimism for the African American civil rights one also...none of the other ones seemed to be as logical. </p>
<p>hmm.. i thought i'd do better on this test, as i actually studied for it. It had too many literature/art/culture references that I didn't know (i focused more on the history, history part...) I didn't omit any though (completely guessed on 5-8, educated guess on about 20-30, knew the rest for sure), but I dunno if that'll come back to haunt me in the end</p>
<p>what about the one that named two women.. it seemed like it could have been feminism but i put helping improve legislation for the disabled (and no this question wasnt one of the obvious settling/hull house ones) any one know what im talking about?</p>
<p>Polska, it was Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, I believe. The answer was equality of women afaik.</p>
<p>"Why did no congressional reapportionment occur in 1920?</p>
<p>Congress failed to reapportion following the 1920 Census. The failure was in part the result of a difference of opinion over the method of dividing political power. Throughout the 1920s, Congress debated which of two mathematical models for reapportionment—whose outcomes for distribution of House seats differed—would be used. In 1929, one mathematical method was selected for the reapportionment, but it was not applied until after the 1930 Census. Furthermore, the debate about apportionment methods was not over. In 1941, a different model was chosen called "the method of equal proportions." It is still in use today.</p>
<p>The failure to reapportion in 1920 was also a reflection of regional power dynamics. The results of the 1920 Census revealed a major and continuing shift in population from rural to urban areas, which meant that many representatives elected from rural districts resisted reapportionment. Also, the growing number of immigrants entering this country had some impact on population shifts. Delay followed delay as rural interests tried to come up with mechanisms that would reduce the impact of the population shift. Congressmen from rural areas that would lose seats to more urbanized areas simply blocked passage of reapportionment legislation for 9 years.</p>
<p>During the congressional debates on Pubic Law 71-13, which was enacted in 1929, language requiring that districts be composed of contiguous, compact territory and contain the same number of individuals was deleted. Therefore, the reapportionment law that finally passed in 1929
was silent on the subject of rules for how the states were to establish districts to elect their representatives. As a result, some states simply stopped redistricting, despite major changes in the internal distribution of their populations over time from rural to urban to suburban. A process of malapportionment—meaning establishment of districts containing unequal population sizes—continued unchecked for decades."</p>
<p>I still thinking the redistricting question was the answer about RURAL something or other</p>
<p>ok thanks :'(</p>
<p>Immigration Act 1965 - <em>is abolishment of quotas</em></p>
<p>for one of the quotes that sounded like it was talking in favor of states rights, did you guys put ratification of federalism
i spent forever on that one, the first choice was continental congress</p>
<p>Polska i put ratification of the constitution but sounds like most people put continental congress</p>
<p>Nixon impeachment shows checks and balances
Redistricting I’m pretty sure ismore living in the subarbs if you have the years right for 1920-1960</p>