<p>Student protests can’t have much of an effect, because they are reviewed before they can even begin protesting. He downplayed them. It wasn’t a great answer choice, but I swear the rest were just plain ****.</p>
<p>Wasn’t that question talking about how one architect went freely between olden architecture and modern? And in that case doesn’t morally flexible work better?</p>
<p>um passage two didnt define term while the first did, so define term isn’t right
downplay not right since author 2 like college students
reluctanly wrong since he never concede the college admine are right
what were the other two choices
also for “too convient”
did you guys say benefit college admin?</p>
<p>why is the answer eclipsed? which questionw as that?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>None of the choices were, IMO. Maybe CB will decide not to score it. :)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Well, thank you. (blushes)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That’s what I put.</p>
<p>ohh sorry that’s what i meant passage 1 explicitly defined, passage 2 very implicitly so that’s why i chose it</p>
<p>@gohackers
Yes, the answer was development.</p>
<p>for too convinient. i first pickd “served the interests of college admin” and changed it to "it solved a common problem at many universities</p>
<p>@3141…
do you know what question the answer was “eclipsed” to? sorry for that awful and incomprehensible syntax</p>
<p>^^Oh, the too convenient question. I definitely went with “served the interests” since Passage 1 explains how the protests were such a problem. Also, I remember a sentence that said something about the college administration exerting their rights as property owners.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No damn clue.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That was my reasoning for that choice. Did I actually pick that at the end? I don’t remember.</p>
<p>I think it was an experimental, dunno why it’s up there.</p>
<p>also for the science passage, the 1st question was “anti-intutive”
and “accounted for how a new way of thinking came about”</p>
<p>“downplay not right since author 2 like college students”</p>
<p>CRITICAL reading my friend. He dedicated half the passage to talking about ways in which colleges silence protesters. Like listen to their proposals before they even start protesting. How the heck can they have a strong effect then?</p>
<p>it was asking what the author did, not the colleges…</p>
<p>idk so lik 2-3 wrong on CR is like a ?
mike what do you normally get on CR?
Fisawalab what did you put for your answer?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yep, that’s why I don’t really buy “downplay.”</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You mean “eclipse,” right?</p>
<p>@314 yeah, i think eclipse was experimental.</p>
<p>And pinkumbrella, what question do you want my answer for?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>What did Passage 2 do but not Passage 1 for the protest question. The one we’ve been debating for the past 2 pages.</p>
<p>does anybody remember abt editor’s change of attitude?
A was like…uncertainty…to smth else…
and B was skepticism to satisfied…</p>
<p>i put A, for some reason that i cant recall…</p>
<p>does anybody remember that problem?</p>
<p>I put define a term. I already said that somewhere else, but maybe it got eclipsed</p>
<p><em>nervous chuckle</em></p>