<p>
</p>
<p>Yes and yes.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I said that “liberal” (the American woman architect who won the job for her liberal use of historic references) was “plentiful.” I was stuck between that and “broad-minded.”</p>
<p>@ scrivener - i agree with all of those. sweet.</p>
<p>From the journalist passage: passage 2 (which hates new media) discusses possible negative impacts of the change which passage 1 discusses</p>
<p>Good work scrivener. I agree. Can you work on the SC list.</p>
<p>Oh, and i said liberal was plentiful. Broad minded was a trap answer i think because that’s what we all think of when we hear the word “liberal”</p>
<p>so what i had compared with others:
-the writer and prince both viewed modernistic architecture as tasteless (something like that) YES
-the writer included the reader for the first time in paragraph 2 or something YES
-in paragraph 3, he never gave a solution to the problem of ugly office buildings YES
-modernist building would look best in an electronic area/industrial city NOOO… but i already knew that
-modernism moved from egalitarianism to snobbish I THINK
-companies create tv shows to appear cultured? CAN’T remember what were the other answers
Liberal = plentiful YES</p>
<p>Lost public favor? Or became debased?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Other answers were definitely wrong.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I can confirm this answer (to the extent of certainty my confirmation gives, well, that’s a different story).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I said that it lost public favor since the author mentioned the “defenseless” public and because there really wasn’t anything to show that it became “debased.”</p>
<p>And broad-minded: [url=<a href=“Google”>Google]Google[/url</a>] So I’m pretty sure it’s plentiful :)</p>
<p>ugh I missed egalitarianism to snobbish. I remember the exact wording. </p>
<p>-the writer included the reader for the first time in paragraph 2 or something YES
-> “explicitly identified with the reader”</p>
<p>Yeah, Mikethechimp i got that as well. </p>
<p>Anyone for the question with the Journalist relationship between passage 1 and passage 2 (Passage 2 discusses possible negative effects of change discussed in passage 1)??</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the vocabulary questions that went along with the ubiquitous section</p>
<p>I put “debased”</p>
<p>I remember the word ubiquitous but it wasn’t the asnwer I put</p>
<p>Oh any1 remember the questing asking why individuals r “defenseless”</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I remember that one other choice for that SC question was soporific.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It just asked for the relationship between the passages.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I said that it was because the public had no control over what was being built.</p>
<p>Also, there was an SC about some guy’s _____ abilities being _______ after he correctly predicted that the magazine would fold. What did you put?</p>
<p>individuals are defenseless because they are powerless to change their environment?</p>
<p>it was that it was receiving unnecessary attention for its preeminence</p>
<p>oh and the short passage about the free speech zone. I first thought the answer was “only served the interests of school administrators.” but i changed it to “solved a common problem at many universities.” now that I think about it, I think I should of stuck with the 1st choice</p>
<p>@31415, i was wondering what you got for that question
and i remember putting prescience…something for that sc</p>
<p>It shall be… prescience. And something.</p>
<p>for the ask Seva sections…
-physical memory (mountains, tea farm)
-the cold (impersonal) manhattan
-divorce papers are accusing
-wise people who gave advice are more accustomed to Manhattan
-her section (took up half the page) was conspicuous
-her boss was at first skeptical, then satisfied (or possibly uncertain, then bewildered?? something like that? I think it was the first one though)
-the advice she would give; many Indians have kept up close relationships while in different countries</p>
<p>and i’m pretty sure ubiquitous was an answer. it was looking for something widespread
agree with the defenseless one</p>
<p>that one was “prescience” and “merited”</p>