<p>It was exhaustive. The archaeologist did thorough, pain staking research and exhaustive means very through...</p>
<p>Uptil now, I've got 3 SC mistakes:
1) I thought the animals who were selective in their food choice were abstemious; the correct answer was discriminating
2) I said the African American woman was visionary; correct answer was ground breaking
3) (Not sure) The actor irritating his actors one ... I chose the defused ...unequanimity one but some are said it was conceded ... confidence or something</p>
<p>I made one mistake in the daughter-mother passage (uptil now) ... the one about irreverent / forceful ... everything else I kinda got ...</p>
<p>I think I made one more mistake ... the one in the elks/hawks passage ... the question was what was a difference in the passages ... I said it can be done in a room v/s it has to be done outdoors ... as the 2nd passage guy approached the 'crowded' room and was giving instructions etc ... I'm not sure about this Question at all.</p>
<p>I think I got 1/2 wrong in the 'computers can be intelligent' passage ...</p>
<p>Damn... so CR max ~ 7/8 wrong ... what does that give?? Was CR lenient this time BTW? I dunno =S</p>
<p>Math I already said I omitted 5 questions ... got the tokens one wrong ... I forgot to divide by 3 or 5 or w/e ... pretty sure everything else is right.</p>
<p>Writing was pretty good for me. I'll share whatever I remember:
1. Essay was good - kinda. Its a kinda topic I can talk about so I get it lol.
2. I wrote the two identifying error ones - the one about business cards and the society speaker one - as no error. I think its right? =S
3. The one about 'in regards to' I said that was the error, should be 'in regard to' i think, they were talking about two things so plural goes with plural.
4. I remember one identifying error one was 'oblivious from'. I thought it was a preposition error and so it should be 'oblivious to'.
5. The forest fire passage one - I remember that I said to get rid of the colon for 'smoke: blah'.
6. I think i got 2/3 As in the 35 Questions for the Correcting Sentences stuff.
7. The question on the rain/snow one was slowing me down in the last section ... I hope I chose the right answer! :)</p>
<p>What was the "groundbreaking" question about?</p>
<p>Two questions:</p>
<p>I also put beneficiary, don't know about whether that question is in the Disney section. Anyone knows about this?
Is the "actors" question counted, or is it experimental?</p>
<p>For the token question, the question says that there are two kinds of token available, and what is the least possible number of token that person can have.</p>
<p>The answer is 195. The question doesn't say he needs to have both.</p>
<p>Well, the thing is, the SAT doesn't make trick questions, and 195 is just too easy of an answer--but who knows. Apparently, the math curve this time is going to be pretty nice, so -1 may still =800, so stop your fretting! lol</p>
<p>Anyway, let's compile a list of the questions that were in the same section as the Disney passage so we know which ones we don't need to debate about. From what I remember, the actor question and the students using calculators being told to work math out by hand (anachronistic, unequivocal, erudite, etc.) were part of the Disney passage. So we can stop talking about them. What else?</p>
<p>And also, Disney passage is for sure the experimental right? Is there anyone here that didn't have it? Or is the international test the same format for all tests (like everyone gets the same experimental?)?</p>
<p>The Disney one is experimental, since some people got math as experimental and they said they did not have Disney passages. They might be lying though XD.</p>
<p>If I ignore the actor question, I might actually get perfect for sentence completion (yappy!).</p>
<p>I think the question asks what the organization receiving the money is called. Because if it is the person who gives money, then patron would also be correct. If I read the question wrong, then... >"<. </p>
<p>patron = One that supports, protects, or champions someone or something, such as an institution, event, or cause; a sponsor or benefactor: a patron of the arts.</p>
<p>Silly me, I put beneficiary. Must've confused it with benefactor. I hope that question was in the experimental section. That's 1 mistake for CR so far. I really hope I didn't make so many careless mistakes on the writing section.</p>