<p>SSfren – assuming diversity is a good thing (exposes students to different perspectives, experiences), are you saying that you would sacrifice diversity admits (lets say 300 admits would not have been admitted on stats alone) just to bring the non-diversity admits from 4700 to 5000?</p>
<p>If the goal of the university is to provide the richest learning environment possible, would you sacrifice diversity for more high stat, undiverse admits?</p>
<p>Would you say that the admissions committees at Harvard, Stanford, etc. should not admit slightly lower statted students in order to reach their diversity objectives? that it is not “fair”?</p>