Does Greater Economic Diversity Require Lower Academic Standards?

<p>Home > Opinions
Staff Editorial: Does Greater Economic Diversity Require Lower Academic Standards?
Issue date: 3/2/06 Section: Opinions
PrintEmailArticle ToolsPage 1 of 1</p>

<p>Usually an elite education, by very definition of the word "elite," means education available to those who not only exhibit academic excellence, but to those who can afford it. However, Smith College's effort to change this generalization has been discredited by another generalization: the U.S News and World Report's national ranking of colleges. But the decision to de-emphasize SAT scores based on the correlation between higher scores and higher income has not, in any way, affected the quality of students accepted here. In fact, the U.S News and World Report makes another generalization in undermining the academic potential of such students because of their economic background. The recent drop in ranking is based solely on lower SAT scores, and does not reflect the rigorous workload or education received here.</p>

<p>Out of fairness to all Smith students who work hard for their education, regardless of economic background, something should be done so that Smith's ratings are as top-notch as the education here. The criteria required of such rankings ought to be changed. After all, the ratings are meant to show the level of education, not the economic background, of students at an institution. </p>

<p>The impact of national rankings are questionable when it comes to the individual, but overtime it has been shown that people consistently use it as a guide when applying to college. For international students, especially, it could have an impact on the number of applicants. So far, this number has not been affected, but over time there is always that possibility.</p>

<p>Instead, Smith College should be applauded, not demoted, for leading the way among respected institutions to open its doors to capable students from an economically diverse background. The class of 2009 has been cited as the most diverse class that Smith College has ever had, and their academic stats speak for themselves. Hopefully this will be an indicator to other colleges and universities that they should make an effort to help people of all incomes to attend. </p>

<p>Smith also, it should be noted, has the resources to do so, but most elite institutions do have a large endowment; there is no reason why others should not make high quality education more accessible to the general public. Lessening the impact that SATs have on a college application may seem like a radical approach, but Smith is well-grounded in its reasons. The Smith community has certainly reaped the rewards of having a more diverse student population and will continue to see its advantages both in the classroom and out. </p>

<p>If U.S News and World Report can recognize the economic diversity at Smith, they should also recognize that lower SAT scores does not mean that Smith has lowered its academic standards. It simply means that Smith has made room for higher diversity standards.</p>

<p>The Staff Editorial represents the collective views of the Editorial Board of the Smith College Sophian, not the views of the entire staff of the Sophian, nor the views of the administration, faculty, staff, or students of the College. Each week, the authorship of this column alternates between members of the Editorial Board.</p>

<p>I'm afraid the SAT score vs. diversity issue is too nuanced for the beancounters at US News.</p>

<p>In the latest U.S. News and World Report Magazine there was an article on Amherst's President Marx trying to do the same thing. They are not thinking of doing away with SAT scores however, but do want to find ways to bring in more of a diverse population.</p>

<p>I'm aware of the article that appeared in Business Week - but was there one in US News as well. What issue please?</p>

<p>Egelloca...you are correct, it was Businessweek. After we read the magazines my wife takes them to the hospital for patients to read. Sorry, I messed it up. It was a very informative article though, and talked about how Amherst wants to try harder to get more diversity in their student body. Marx is convinced that is the way to go, but I do not think that many professors there feel the same way.</p>

<p>I'm pretty sure that someone posted a link & there was follow-up discussion in the Parents Forum.</p>

<p>It amazes me that people can seriously put the word ‘diversity’ in the same sentence as ‘Smith college’. Its whole ethos is based on a rejection of diversity insofar as it restricts half the population from attending based on an immutable characteristic: gender.</p>

<p>I have to disagree with you, lady. I don’t think that being single gender has precluded Smith from attempting to be more diverse. I think it’s worth remembering that Smith offered eduction to women before it was commonly available. Indeed, when male domination of higher education was the norm. Therefore, I would argue that single gender schools should be looked at as having historically embraced diversity, not as having rejected it.
-A satisfied 2014er</p>

<p>It amazes me that someone would go through all the trouble of dredging up a thread from 2006 just to make an inane comment on it.</p>

<p>A sign that some folks have too much time on their hands?</p>

<p>wow lady, if you want to have a fight about the merits of single sex vs. coed take it elsewhere. we all LOVE Smith just the way it is…do like it? Don’t apply!</p>