Statistics are funny things…
First, pick the field you’re going to be about and can see your self being involved with for 30+ years and not whatever happens to be the hot field today (what’s “hot” tends to go in cycles).
Is Nuclear Engineering more “desirable” because it’s projected growth is 9% vs. ME’s 5%? Or is ME’s is more “desirable” because it’s going to grow a base of 258K jobs by 12,000, vs NE’s base of 20,000 jobs that will grow by only 1,900? Both fields will have enough “entry” positions to support the number of engineering graduating with each degree.
When I look at these statistics, I get a sense of the number of folks working in each occupation, where the jobs are located, what are the top industries for folks with this type of degree, and how fast it may be growing.
If I was thinking of going into NE, I would notice that salaries look fine (compared to other engineers), that jobs are mostly in Power Generation, and then Federal Government and research; that the highest paying jobs are in consulting and research; and that jobs are much more common in states like Virginia (Fed’s) and Tennessee (power generation) and rare in states with neither (Oregon, Arkansas, etc.).
Based on that data, I would know which industries to target. If I wanted to go into power generation, I would look to get internships and co-ops. After a few years, I may then want to go back to school for my MS and then move to a Federal Government (or consulting) role.
If I wanted to do research, then plan on getting a MS and then a PhD and focus on undergraduate research (vs. internships). Most universities that offer a NE program do a decent job of supporting undergraduate research, but if yours does not, then that would be a red flag if you’re thinking of going the NE-Research route.
Good Luck!