<p>
DukeEng, Stanford and Duke, like their peers, are academic institutions. Their primary goal is to provide academic training for their students.
Well, sure. And, fortunately, I love the smell of condescension in the morning just as much as the next poster, as it turns out.</p>
<p>In the meantime, the admissions office has the goal of putting together a "more interesting" group of students each year out of the numerous academically qualified and gifted ones. If you're "not a particularly 'involved' person," why should I waste space and time on you when I have a dozen people just like you trying to get here who also demonstrate that they may take an interest in the institution and their communities, and be not only great academically but also provide something unique to the school and to the class? If you have no involvement, why be offended at being considered a less interesting candidate (not that I, at any point, did so but you chose to put those words into play)? Once you do something about it, you are de facto involved, no?</p>
<p>
And besides, I hate to say it, but the way admissions are now, simply having good grades (even a 4.0) and a 1550 on the SAT can't guarantee you ANYTHING at the "top schools."
</p>
<p>
Great academic credentials don't "guarantee" admission to top schools...
So, apparently, you do NOT soundly disagree with all of bandcampgirl's post.</p>