<p>
[quote]
University President Drew G. Faust said in a statement that the return of early action, an admissions practice which Harvard had previously called unfair to students from disadvantaged backgrounds, is now “consistent with our bedrock commitment to access, affordability, and excellence.”
<p>I don’t know. I’m a current senior, so I didnt apply early to Harvard, but I think its somewhat unfair. People that apply early are gonna be in a smaller pool, and have more time to be discussed at. I think it should at least by restrictive early action. Anyone agree?</p>
<p>This development is probably for the better. Harvard, for better or for worse, is still the first choice for a lot of applicants. So long as there hasn’t been an early program, a lot of would-be Harvard EA/SCEA/ED applicants have gone with a “what-the-heck” application to Yale, Stanford, MIT, Chicago, or Georgetown. If Harvard and Princeton implement SCEA policies, it will reduce the crush of applicants who don’t really want to go to other EA places who apply anyway, as well as cutting down a few hundred very strong applications during the regular cycle which would keep some otherwise very qualified people out of top schools.</p>
My bad.
Do you have a link to this press release? And does it mention for sure that the SCEA is for internationals as well?
This is sort of ridiculous. Couldn’t they have made this choice a year ago?</p>
<p>Too bad for the 2015 hopefuls that truly have Yale or Stanford as their first choice that they did not do this last year. How the heck are the adcoms supposed to figure out the numbers? Just a crazy system. 35,000 apps to the super selective schools! REALLY? Okay - vent over.</p>