<p>Haha Rabban, SO TRUE.
Finals are right now, and the majority of anyone you see out is either:
1. Rushing to a review session
2. Turning something in/picking something up
3. Going to/from firestone (the library)
4. And, god forbid they arent somehow preoccupied with finals related stuff, theyre STILL stressed, lol.
Again though, this just makes it all the funner, in a sadistic way. You have to roll with the punches, you know?</p>
<p>Okay, then ORFE and math track:
We don't have regular operations research, just operations research AND financial engineering...which means that the department really focuses a lot more on the analytical stochastic side of modeling rather than anything more economics-ey. you program and do high level math a lot in orfe, though in essence, it just means that you are more prepared for technical analysis of stocks, rather than fundamental analysis...either way, it's a random walk, no?</p>
<p>At the beginning of this semester, I dipped into both econ 302 and 312, which are econometrics and math track econometrics respectively. I decided on 312, but thought i should dabble with 302 because i wasnt sure if my stats knowledge (havent touched the subject since ap stats junior year of hs) was sufficient. Turns out, they both do the same thing, with proofs, same equations, etc, but with one intense difference. 312 applies a lot more calculus, and deriving of formulas, where the proofs in 302 seemed more plug and chug...and hence simpler. Generally, this is the overall concensus on the ddivergence in math track-non math track. </p>
<p>One side note: One thing i am displeased with is the registrar's scheduling of math track/non math track econ. Each related pair, like 302-312, or 310-300, are scheduled for THE SAME lecture slot. Therefore, u cannot attend both...grrr...that was an issue, i must say.</p>