Hi, all,
I’ve been running NPCs on some of our target schools, and I’m coming up with weird numbers. Our EFC on FAFSA estimators is between $5,000 and $6,000 on an AGI of approx 60 - 65k. (varies by a few k depending on the year, sometimes we’re Pell-eligible and sometimes not). I’ve been running the NPCs multiple times because I want to see the potential impact of a raise, of going back to DH’s employer healthcare (before tax prems = lower AGI), etc.
I’m finding that Ivies are spitting out really low numbers for us, lower in many cases than the LACs and some of the best NMF packages.
Examples:
Stanford = $4000, of which $2,900 is work study and $1,100 is the student’s summer job (so nothing from us)
Princeton = $2,900 from us, $1,100 student summer work and $2,900 in work study
Rice = $7,078 from us, $2,500 in work study
Pomona = $7,922 from us, $2,000 in work study
Carleton = $11,560 (includes a $4,500 loan grumble)
Local UC = $15,566 (We’re Blue & Gold eligible, so this is R&B, parking, books, etc.)
I feel like I’m missing something here, but I’m not sure what it is. We haven’t been looking at Ivies (I ran the numbers on a lark). We’ve been looking at meets-full-need privates and the big NMF packages.
If the NPCs are accurate, then Stanford and Princeton (if he gets in) are cheaper than the the LACs, and cheaper than the Bama NMF* package?
How accurate are the NPCs? If that’s true about Stanford, then I guess we’ll look at Stanford. (Not sure about Princeton and the other Ivies.)
*On the plus side, the NMF offers are guaranteed; we won’t need to worry about financial aid changes if we get a raise or some other windfall.
Takeaway: So I guess a family with a high stats kid in our income range should consider Ivies?