Entry System Changing Drastically

As most people here probably already know, the entry system is one of Williams’s most unique characteristics. Until just recently, the entry system consisted of 2 JA’s per approximately 20-25 students. This year, however, marks the first year of a big change: there are now 3-4 JA’s per 40-50 first years. Some initial reactions to the changes can be found here: https://williamsrecord.com/2018/10/jas-react-to-new-system-larger-entries/

Personally, I’m not that worried about the changes to the entry system, but more so concerned with the impetus for why people wanted the system to change. JA’s had complained of being overloaded with emotional work and not getting adequate compensation, with minority JA’s being especially overburdened with the amount of minority students coming to them for support. I’m a white male so I won’t claim to be able to comment on the minority experience in the entry system — actually, it seems to me that the changes made probably have the most benefits for minority students due to less of a feeling of tokenization and isolation — but I can definitely offer my two cents on why JA’s have felt more overworked in the past two years than in the 40 or so before that, where it was a hard job but not an impossible one.

First, why have JA’s been feeling overworked? There are obviously many factors at play here, but I think that the major cause is an increase in the acceptability of struggling with mental health. With so many young people now realizing that it is quite normal to struggle with anxiety, depression, or even just having hard days, the frequency of people reaching out for support will inevitably be higher. We’ve seen this effect elsewhere at Williams too, as psych services has had to be significantly expanded in the wake of the infamous “marble block” event. JA’s that used to deal with a couple kids with significant mental distress per entry are now inundated with students that have recognized their mental problems and, in a time of great change in their lives, are coming to a college-given resource in droves. This naturally places a much heavier burden on JA’s. Now, don’t get me wrong, I think that the decreased stigma on mental health issues is a great thing, but it’s become a really widespread issue that the JA’s in years past have definitely been taking the brunt of the increase (see also: “Williams Depression” shirts).

The second part of the complaints was the lack of compensation, which I think is indicative of a much larger campus problem: a lack of community. JA’s have been complaining about lack of pay since the dawn of time, but it only picked up steam in the past couple of years. To my mind, this indicates that an element of the actual compensation to JA’s was lost: prestige. JA used to be a highly prestigious position, with only the best of the best getting to live in an entry for a second year. That prestige has DEFINITELY dropped off recently, just as applications have been decreasing for years on end. In fact, last year JAAB (JA Advisory Board) had to beg more people to apply because not enough suitable candidates had. When your peers no longer look up to you as a result of being a JA, you’re naturally less inclined to become one without some other form of compensation. The question of why the prestige declined, however, is the one I’m really interested in. Although I don’t have any hard answers, I have a hunch that it is connected with a pretty widely recognized trend of a decrease in community feel at Williams.

Community at Williams has been decreasing since my first year. Intramural sports, which I had participated in as a freshman, have become pretty much nonexistent. Entries, which used to spend the first 2-ish months just hanging out with each other, have started to fragment much more quickly. And people that live on the same hallway can go an entire year without getting to know each other if they didn’t pick in together, which I know from direct experience living in a couple buildings without floor common rooms. Even houses with common rooms on each floor can suffer from this issue, as the biggest and loudest pick group will usually win de facto control of the common space closest to them. This slow decline in community feel coincides closely with the decimation of the neighborhood system. Before the 2008 financial crisis, my understanding of the neighborhood system was that it dictated that students could only pick into one neighborhood for all three years after their entry was finished, with the exception of off-campus housing. This split the campus living situation into smaller groups that were really forced to get to know each other, at least partially. It’s much harder to justify not getting to know someone when they’re part of a group of 150 people (average number of people per class year in each neighborhood) that you will be living with for the next 3 years. The expansion of your potential living-mates from ~150 over 3 years to ~500 is a huge difference, and even starker if you ignore class borders: ~300-400 to ~1500. This expansion made Williams no longer feel small and intimate, but rather — somehow — large and impersonal. That was my experience by senior year, and I know it was the experience of others as well. So to me, the current lack of prestige of the JA position makes perfect sense, as there’s no reason to value people that help the community when there doesn’t feel like there’s much of a community at all.

Having said all this, I’d like to offer some pretty significant caveats: I was not a JA, so I won’t claim to know exactly what that experience was like. I am white and male, so the minority experience may be very different (although probably not better). I have benefitted enormously from my time at Williams, and have grown into someone that is much more self-sufficient than before, although I do think that that would have happened at most high-caliber institutions. And this is just my personal experience, though I think it is probably generalizable across many people at Williams, especially non-athletes since athletes still have the built-in team community. But at the end of the day, Williams has a crisis of community right now, and I think the entries can feel that. First years basically take their lead for how to act socially from the upperclassmen, and if there’s no attempt at community from seniors and juniors then there will almost certainly be a similar lack of effort from the newest members of the college. I, and many others, see the entry system as being on its last legs simply because it is essentially alone in attempting to foster community at Williams.

Now, i don’t think that these problems are insurmountable, nor do I think that they will always exist. We have a new president and the new entry system seems to be making some positive changes, at least so far. I was also a senior when I really started noticing this lack of community and am generally a little cynical about large institutions in general, so maybe it was partially SWUG-ness. But I worry about the state of the Williams community, and I think we will need to be very intentional at creating spaces where community and comradeship can be fostered amongst the upper classes, because we currently don’t have much in the way of structure past the entry system.

Make what you will of all of this. I don’t think Williams is a bad place, just a hard place to be sometimes. It makes you grow a lot, and that’s very valuable in such formative years. But sometimes I wish it had been a little easier to feel like I was a part of something greater.

Thank you for posting this. My daughter applied to Williams ED, so I’m very interested to see what life is like there in case she gets in. Fortunately, the entry system was not one of the primary reasons she was interested in Williams. I don’t think she or I really got what was that special about the entry system from our tour–it just seemed like a bunch of people living together as a starting point for finding friend groups. She’s pretty gregarious, so I’m not worried about her ability to form relationships without a strong entry system. (If she were more of a loner or afraid of getting to know people, I’d be much more concerned about these changes.) I do worry that the mental health services at Williams–and pretty much every other college–are overburdened. My daughter doesn’t suffer from any major mental health issues AFAIK, but I don’t know how she’ll respond to such a drastic change in environment from high school on the west coast to college in the east.

By the way, what is the “infamous marble block event”? I did a Google search for Williams College marble block, but nothing jumped out. I’d never heard of it before.

I can only comment on the current experience as a parent hearing from my freshman child at Williams, but the entry has been perhaps the best part of his experience this year.

It created an immediate “family.” My son felt happily “connected” from his very first week at Williams. His entrymates go to meals together, study in the common room together, go places together (museums, hikes, events, parties, snack bar, etc.), and attend one another’s sports games, dance recitals, shows, etc.

I did not know if the newly larger sized entries (now 38 instead of 20 kids) would erode community this year, but apparently they did not, at least in my kid’s entry. It just provided a larger group and more freedom to move among different subgroups and meet new people, as well as more opportunity to find the people with whom you feel closest. A bigger entry is a better entry, from his viewpoint.

The other thing I love about the entry is its diversity. My son has close friends from many different backgrounds- different races, socioeconomic backgrounds, nations, genders, interests. They are all together as one big “family.”

And there are other communities of which to be a part at Williams. The WOOLF group who backpacked together during freshman orientation days meets for meals and parties sometimes. Club members dine together. People in a class together may also meet up to study or eat.

The sense of “community” is what is making Williams so great for my son. (As well as the amazingly great professors and classes!)

It is interesting to hear the OP’s perspective, and I guess it shows there are different experiences for different people, because it is so radically different from what I hear. As a parent, I could not be happier with Williams so far, and the close, caring “community” is a big reason why.

I could have written this entire post as my sophomore son’s experiences mirrors those of @TheGreyKing’s son.

I find this all really interesting. Why did intramural sports at Williams cease to exist rather recently? What is “picking” for those of us new to the school?

My sophomore daughter also had a wonderful entry experience, although she did observe that not all of the entries were as close as hers. I suppose some click more than others. She is living with some of her entry mates again this year and they definitely are her “besties” in addition to her teammates on her athletic team. The entry experience was so valuable to her that she is considering applying to be a JA next year.

@24daffodils “Picking” is a term used to describe how housing is assigned for upperclassmen. Students form a “pick group” of up to 6 students and they choose their housing as a group based on lottery numbers.

Thank you, @schoolview !

A recent grad I know did not have an entry that gelled really well, but he was an athlete and tight with his team so it had no impact on his experience. His sib, also an athlete, had a good entry (but also chose to room with teammates)… To the extent that there is serendipity in how a group will come together, making the group bigger sounds like it could address that a bit. Greater odds thst you’ll find a subgroup within it. Sounds - from a distance - like a good change.

My son was a JA in 2006. He considered it an honor and a privilege, one of the rewarding of many wonderful Williams experiences. I’m heartened to hear from current Williams’ students and families that the newly re-sized entries still provide a warm and inviting environment for Williams’ first years. When the changes were being debated, I was worried that doubling the size of the entry would dilute the special relationship among entry-mates and their JAs. As an observer (just a parent, not an alumna myself) I regretted the decision to reconfigure one of Williams’ hallmark institutions, but as long as it’s working out, then I’d say it was the right call.

JAs go through extensive training on how to deal with all kinds of first year issues – from the mundane to the serious – but for sure they are not professional mental health or substance abuse counselors, nor should they be expected to be. They provide big brother/sister guidance and often a soft shoulder. They make sure that everyone who wants to be included in an entry activity is invited to join and they help defuse conflicts that are inherent in dorm living. Personally, I don’t see that making the JA a paid position would necessarily improve the quality or dedication of the JA cohort.

According to the Williams Record article that I read at the time (I can’t seem to find an archived copy) the issue that selection committee wrestled with was not that there weren’t enough qualified and enthusiastic applicants to choose from; the problem was more that there weren’t enough applicants who reflected the diverse demographic of Williams student body. Also, about a third of the junior class studies away, which precludes JA involvement. One of the ideas that the committee kicked around to expand the pool was the possibility of opening the position to seniors, including former JAs, but ultimately they decided that going with larger entries was the best option.

The initial response seems mostly optimistic.
https://williamsrecord.com/2018/10/jas-react-to-new-system-larger-entries/

Both my kids (classes of '18 and '20) loved their entries, JAs, and have remained incredibly close with a percentage of each entry, living with them in later years, and beyond graduation. Both thought it was a wonderful aspect that made Williams special. DD '20 discussed the pressures on the JAs with me before the announced changes and said it was one reason she didn’t become a JA herself. I think the experiment is worth trying.

@jersey454 thanks so much for starting this thread. My son is a freshman at Williams and the entry system was a factor in his decision (albeit relatively small). So I was very surprised and disappointed that, with no prior announcement, Williams doubled the size of the entries. The entry system (with 18-22 members) was widely promoted in the admissions process. My son is a member of a sports team, so he is definitely making friends, but few are outside the team/in his entry.

The following quote from the article mentioned really resonated with me: “A weakness is that it is hard to have entry meetings because of the bigger sized entries… some of the frosh in the entry don’t really feel as part of an ‘entry’ because there are so many people in it that they don’t really know.”

The size of the entry should be driven by what freshman want/need, NOT by the needs of the JAs. Would have been nice to have multiple reactions from first year students in the article. Curious if there are any differences in success/failure of the new system between the Frosh Quads and Mission.

I too had heard from Williams alums that the JA position was considered quite prestigious. Williams has the wherewithal to pay JAs more and Dean Johnson should be more proactive in recruiting JAs and bringing back prestige to the role.

Times and needs of a school may change, but… the fact that Junior Advisors are unpaid was always a big part of the philosophy. Unlike RA’s at other colleges, JA’s do not work for the college and are not expected to be disciplinarians or enforcers, just slightly more experienced friends.

Even in last year’s viewbook put out by the college, the description of JA says, “special to Williams, not to be confused with RA.” Why not to be confused with RA? Because they don’t work for the college! That was the key difference.

The dean does not recruit JA’s. It is an entirely student-run process. A student committee (JAAB) selects the JA’s through an application process/selection committee.

My contacts tell me that the “infamous marble block event” was a steam-venting, primal scream sponsored by a student group, so named for the marble benches in front of the library. No biggie. :slight_smile: