<p>
[quote]
A2.... Penn has D1 football and basketball....
[/quote]
</p>
<p>That's false information.</p>
<p>Penn doesn't have Division I football. They are in the weak Division 1-AA. </p>
<p>And everyone is in Division 1 in basketball. It's just that if you aren't in a major conference, you aren't any good, don't get any births into the tournament, and play against crap competition.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Don't you mean really, really, really prestigious, but a little below really, really, really, really prestigious? When you get to the highest echelons of higher education, doesn't it get a little absurd to say there's a measurable difference of quality among schools? Isn't the measure of that elusive thing we call "quality" impossible?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Obviously, I was being sarcastic... you ask a stupid question... you get a stupid answer.</p>
<p>Does anyone know how UChicago’s biology courses stack up? I know that in all it’s a great school, and it’s usually known for science, but I haven’t heard much about biology in particular.</p>
<p>It is definitely in the top group of universities, but nobody can say “exactly” how good anything is. The answer is different for each person. None of these schools has a corner on knowledge and none has a secret ingredient to make you successful.</p>
Innovation in approaches to numerous academic fields and a historic commitment to interdisciplinary work (there are no undergraduate departments per se; professors are appointed to “The College”)
A self-consciously intellectual climate. The university has excellent, up-to-date athletic facilities and activity in many sports (martial arts, Lake Michigan sailing, etc.), but no D1 sports programs. Football was completely banned for many years. The College produces the largest number of PhDs per capita of any comprehensive, national liberal arts university, not including the two leading technical institutes, CalTech and MIT ([COLLEGE PHD PRODUCTIVITY](<a href=“Doctoral Degree Productivity - Institutional Research - Reed College”>http://www.reed.edu/ir/phd.html</a>))
<p>For years Chicago has had a higher admission rate than many peer schools, with admit rates as high as 40% or more (although average test scores have long been very high). This year the rate dropped to 18% in the wake of increased direct-mail advertising and the adoption of the Common Application.</p>
<p>Chicago is an excellent school with a great reputation. (As proof, I even live in Connecticut and know how good a school Chicago is.) From a faculty standpoint, the school attracts famous scholars in all fields from physics to philosophy. My friend is a Chicago graduate and he says that the school has a very intellectual atmosphere. He once told me that (paraphrasing) “Every party becomes a discussion about Hobbes.” Chicago, however, is also known as the school where “fun comes to die”, and my friend partially agrees. Because of the shorter terms, there is a lot more coursework to be done in a shorter span of time. Needless to say, students at all top tier schools get stressed as a result of the amount of work, so don’t think that Chicago’s rigor is drastically different from say Yale or Harvard’s. A degree from Chicago is surely an impressive achievement that looks fantastic on a resume.</p>
<p>It definitely is a very good school. Very very intellectual. So intellectual that the school is the one pushing the students to enjoy their weekends.</p>