@twoinanddone I didn’t see your earlier post, sorry for not fully responding. My stepson did have some need met at his LAC for all 4 years but it was relatively small (maybe 1500?) the first 3 with a work study option (3K if memory serves) to supplement which he didn’t do, don’t get me started on that one lol. His final year that overlapped with his sister did have a significant uptick in the award amount but my husband has never provided financials to the ex or to the school. It is not a profile school and is mid tier tuition wise. As I’ve no clue on his mom’s financials I cannot say whether it was full need or not. Solo no, I would not qualify for Pell and am just over the AOTA. You are correct that in a FAFSA only school, all it would do is show a need/shortfall, versus not showing one. It would not be a guarantee of any kind of aid though theoretically and improved chance at scholarships that had a need requirement and qualifying for subsidized versus non subsided student loan for my son.
S17 loves the feel of the LAC’s. Loves it. There are schools he would love to attend although program wise they are turning out to not be the best fit. Certainly the lack of funding with my ex is well documented through the courts. The EFC differential only matters in the event of an LAC application at a school tha meets full need. At any rate, I’m over it and don’t need to vent anymore. There were 2 long shot LAC’s that might have been doable in a full need scenario if we could claim 2 kids and need was met/offered. Both are Profile schools. Based on those schools net calculators and their common data sets it seemed that it might be possible. We can’t and that’s that. Not the best fit anyway based on current major plans anyway it is just sad that there really is no point in even considering either, even as a reach. That’s just reaching too far on every level for the work entailed in the application process. It does give me concern for his brothers options but we will just need to get creative and better to know now. Venting won’t change it.
My COA is including transportation, books and general cost of living. The “other” may be overstated to be sure, although flying the shuttle to Denver to get back to Seattle is an extra $300 per ticket so that would add up. Driveable some of the time for sure but in winter, I wouldn’t be all that keen on it. This is what I have.
15,631.00 Tuition
10,037.00 R&B
1,200.00 Books
3,040.00 Other (cell phone, transportation, entertainment etc)
(6,000.00) Rocky Mountain
23,908.00
That price tag is livable and certainly lower is always better. I do not expect him to hit the WUE threshold on the ACT so this is likely what we are looking at.
Love that on the club hockey, DSD plays club at Cal Poly and it’s not cheap. Cheaper than club in HS was though! That is amazing about the outdoor activities being subsidized, I hope that comes up on the tour, S would be all over that. I actually think S would like Corvallis, his issue is more with the school than with the town. On the flip side I can’t remotely see him in Ellensburg (Central WA) or Pullman (WSU) so it really will be interesting to see how both towns feel to him.
What is your daughter majoring in now? Sounds like she started in theater but changed?
Much as he loves Portland, I think he’d be fine in a small town, and ultimately like it better if there was enough culture (music/theater/outdoors) and decent food. He is very concerned about food. Luckily the boy can cook just fine. He bemoans our lack of snow all the time.