<p>"im not operating under any assumption. i even said on page 4 that the OP should do it anonymously. what i was arguing was the fact that you think that even if the dude finds out the OP did it, he would simply be "jailed." no, thats wrong."</p>
<p>What? I never said that the guy would be jailed for no reason. I'm not stupid, I promise. That was in direct response to people who said that the Yale admit would physically harm him, or, God forbid, KILL him. </p>
<p>"and you also bring in facts about your neighborhood and how there is no vandalism. WHO CARES. how does that affect the cheater's potential to vandalize?"</p>
<p>It doesn't affect it at all. However, if vandalism is extremely uncommon, it makes sense that the OP would not have something of his vandalized, if he were to be identified at all. People get ****ed all the time. That doesn't mean that vandalism occurs. You can't even suggest that this guy WILL vandalize the OP. Only the OP can really know.</p>
<p>"and more, you make the assumption that i live in a ghetto neighborhood. again, no. the average house value where i live is one million, yet im quite sure that if someone were to screw someone else over, something would go down."</p>
<p>I never made that suggestion at all. But you asked if I had heard of vandalism or assault in my area. It occurs very infrequently (vandalism of personal property almost never happens), and the guy generally gets caught. It just doesn't come up. People screw each other over all the time over here. They deal with it. Please don't make assumptions about people you don't know. If the kid is totally erratic and has a history of vandalism, maybe there is a concern. But even if I got that ****ed, I'm not sure that I would vandalize something. Just, let's try not to make assumptions about things we don't know. I'll try to stop as well.</p>
<p>"im not arguing whether what the cheater did is ETHICALLY wrong. obviously it is. what i AM arguing is whether it even matters anymore."</p>
<p>It does matter. Assume Yale finds out some other way. How about a possible conversation at his HS:</p>
<p>GC: Oh, Timmy, go ask xxxx for a rec. She wrote a great one for Tom!
Timmy: Sure bet, Mr. xxxx! That's swell!</p>
<p>Later that same day...</p>
<p>Timmy: Oh, Ms. xxxx! You look ravishing! I heard about the great rec you wrote for Tom last year! I would love if you could write one for me, if it wouldn't bother you!
Ms. xxxx: ...............</p>
<p>There. Cover blown. Timmy knows, Ms. xxxx knows, the GC knows. If one of them decides to contact Yale, the latter may decide that the school is untrustworthy. Given what I've seen at my own school, that situation is not at all unlikely.</p>
<p>You are potentially destroying the trust between Yale and the school by not addressing it now.</p>