<p>See above :P</p>
<p>I was wondering the same thing…bump!</p>
<p>bump bUMp bUmP!!!</p>
<p>me too! i sent some okay–not great–scores to all of my colleges accidentally!</p>
<p>ME three!</p>
<p>and what scores are you all considering low?</p>
<p>Well, I haven’t taken my subject tests yet, I’m just planning ahead.</p>
<p>bump 10^char</p>
<p>double bump!</p>
<p>no one but the admission’s office themselves will know that. I guess it’s just a matter of what they think is important or not.</p>
<p>If I worked for admissions I would be put off my someone with a 500 score more than someone without a score at all.</p>
<p>So you’re saying that for those colleges that do not require SAT II, your subject test scores, no matter how bad, could only help you right?</p>
<p>No you idiot. he means that a score of 500 would be worse than having no score at all, which means it would absolutely not help you</p>
<p>^^^^^ what a tool</p>
<p>“If I worked for admissions I would be put off my someone with a 500 score more than someone without a score at all.”</p>
<p>In response,</p>
<p>“So you’re saying that for those colleges that do not require SAT II, your subject test scores, no matter how bad, could only help you right?”</p>
<p>How’d you interpret that?</p>