<ol>
<li> A few years ago, a good friend had children simultaneously at Duke and Schreyer/Penn State – sisters one year apart. Sort of like a controlled experiment. The Penn State kid generally liked it (except . . . see below), had a great time, had good internships and found an OK job after graduation. But the educational experiences of the two students were barely comparable. The Duke kid worked her butt off, was constantly being challenged, grew intellectually a lot, was encouraged to be much more ambitious. The Penn State kid pretty much coasted through her first two years, and might just as well have been majoring in sorority, with no bad effect on her grades. She got more serious later, but it was a combination of circumstances and her own maturation. Nothing in the environment told her that she had to do that. And from the standpoint of rigor/sophistication, nothing in the Penn State student’s curriculum (in political science) matched anything in the Duke student’s curriculum (in economics).</li>
</ol>
<p>In short, Penn State was fine, a good experience overall, but this particular pair of kids was not a strong argument for Schreyer being in the mix with the Ivies or their equivalents. (Of course, there was a reason one of them wound up at Duke, and the other at Penn State, in the first place. But in terms of grades, scores, interests, and of course genetics they were pretty equivalent.)</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Penn State is really not very popular at my children’s large urban public high school, the principal academic magnet for the City of Philadelphia. Most of the strongest students aspire to go to Penn (if they can’t get into Harvard), and surprisingly few of them look to Schreyer as their next option. (Some do, but it’s usually 6-8 kids out of a class of 500+.) Both Temple and Pitt are as or more popular as public destinations for strong students. Pitt has a good honors college, too, and the kids understand how to get the best out of Temple (which gets close to 100 kids/year from this school). The word on Penn State is that it is full of partying suburban kids, and is boring for kids who are used to being in a big city. Also, it feels much whiter than Temple or Pitt. (Not that there aren’t plenty of students of color, but they are comparatively fewer, and way more suburban. The OP may find this attractive.)</p></li>
<li><p>The Penn State girl I discussed above had a shocking, horrible experience with her sorority, one that I had trouble believing. Towards the end of her sophomore year, her father was publicly accused of a crime. She was shunned by her sorority sisters, and ultimately felt that she had to withdraw from the sorority. Until that point, the sorority had absolutely been the center of her world; she loved it. It was an unbelievable betrayal; I can’t imagine what those girls were thinking, given that this kid had nothing to do with her father’s crime. (It was technical white collar stuff, and actually quite an aggressive, outrageous prosecution. The centerpiece of the case against him were actions that none of his peers considered unusual or illegal at all.) After a few months of tears, it all wound up being for the best, because the girl transferred her focus to her studies, and found some more reliable friends. But I was sure left with a bad taste in my mouth. Penn State is a big place, and has lots of different kinds of people, but I wouldn’t want to go to college with people like that.</p></li>
</ol>