<p>[Primer:</a> General Funds](<a href=“http://www.budget.psu.edu/openbudget/primer_genfunds.aspx]Primer:”>http://www.budget.psu.edu/openbudget/primer_genfunds.aspx)</p>
<p><a href=“Error Page”>Error Page;
<p>State funds make up 14% of Penn State’s general academic budget. </p>
<p>State funds made up 50% of Penn State’s general academic budget in 1987 and 30% in 2007.</p>
<p>The trick is when they start adding up residence halls, dining facilities, the airport, the Hershey Medical Center operations, the golf courses, the hotels, the research park, and then claim that the state money is a small percentage of those total operations. Those other operations are designed to be self-supporting, and were never intended to be subsidized by the state.</p>
<p>The state appropriation is critical to maintain a discount for in-state vs. out of state students. If the state appropriation disappears (which Corbett would like to do eventually), the in-state tuition rate would go up to the out of state rate.</p>
<p>Penn State and Pitt have the distinction of having the two highest in-state tuition rates in the US. On the average, PA. is 40th among the 50 states in average state spending per public university student. If these cuts continue, we wil be battling Mississippi for 50th place.</p>
<hr>
<p>Take a look at the data for each public university on collegeboard.com. None of the public universities in PA. come close to meeting all of student’s proven financial needs. Penn State is only about 50%. The Governor is at the same time cutting the PHEAA program that provides need based grants directly to students.</p>
<p>There are some solutions - close the Delaware Loophole that allows many corporations to unfairly avoid PA. taxes. Delay the reductions in the State business tax rates. Raise the gas extraction fee to a rate that is equal to an average for similar states, instead of having one of the lowest rates in the country. Spend some of the state’s surplus, which Corbett says he needs to save for “a rainy day.” Hey, its really raining down here.</p>
<p>Other states such as Maryland are handling these matters in a much more intelligent matter. They are rewarding universities with funding if they improve cost-efficiencies, avoid large tuition increases and increase enrollments in science, technological and other fields where there are the greatest needs. That may involve financially penalizing some universities that refuse to adapt. However, it doesn’t involve blindly slashing every university’s funding with a machete.</p>