<p>There you go, straight from the horse's mouth:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/Article.aspx?ref=519172%5B/url%5D">http://www.thecrimson.com/Article.aspx?ref=519172</a></p>
<p>
[quote]
The median first-year base salary for male members of the Class of 2007 is $60,000, compared to $50,000 for females, according to the survey results.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Of course, this is starting salary, but even if you add in all the graduates, I doubt it would go above the 100,000-200,000 range.</p>
<p>More proof:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/21/AR2006022101166_pf.html%5B/url%5D">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/21/AR2006022101166_pf.html</a></p>
<p>
[quote]
In 2005 the median starting salary for a new Harvard University MBA was $100,000. An MBA is a two-year degree. By contrast, a science or engineering PhD can take five to 10 years, with a few years of "post-doc" lab work. At a Business Roundtable press briefing, one CEO said his company might start this sort of scientist at $90,000. Does anyone wonder why some budding physicists switch to Wall Street?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>So for all those who didn't just get an undergraduate degree from Harvard, but a MBA after completing its business school, only averaged $100,000. A science/engineering PhD might get paid around $90,000. After 10-20 years, how much would these Harvard graduates get paid, on average? $150,000? $200,000? Maybe. $1,860,000? Not a chance.</p>