<p>
[quote]
i fully support AA, but must ask YOU to "get real" on this point.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>No, I think you're a bit off base here. </p>
<p>Harvard has an outstanding reputation. Accordingly, many underqualified people hoping to go there--of all races--will, yes, apply. And get rejected. Many qualified people will apply and, yes, get rejected.</p>
<p>But the entire AA debate always seems to hinge somewhat on whether or not the URMs who apply are underqualified, qualified, or--though rarely, because most of America seems to think this is impossible--overqualified. There is a degree of self-selectivity within certain communities that people arguing on both sides always fail to consider. Harvard still has a reputation for being a school that is a) impossible to get into and b) only for rich white kids. Oh, and c) way too expensive (that's a huge one). Think about it: if you're a poor kid with an 1100 (on the old scale), is the school with the really high avg. SAT score and the 46K tuition going to top your list? Many people--even people on CC--still don't know about HFAI or about how SAT scores are actually taken into consideration.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is that these underqualified URMs that people keep talking about, these "poor kids with the bad SAT scores" who have to have the standards "lowered" for them when they apply to Harvard aren't necessarily the majority of the URMs applying to Harvard. Because those kids are actually the ones that programs like mine are actively recruiting, to tell them about how white harvard /isn't/ or how expensive it /isn't/, which aren't necessarily things that the black kids at Exeter with great scores are worrying about.</p>
<p>You all really need to place more emphasis on context and less on "the numbers." There are poor white kids with bad SAT scores who are applying, as well--where's the argument that standards are "lowered" for them if, technically, they are facing the same educational disadvantages as the similar URM applicant? Why is it that when we see someone with a lower SAT score, we assume that they're black or latino, or if we know their race, we assume that they'll get in /because/ of their race? And what was GW's SAT score, again?</p>
<p>FYI, to get in /because of/ your race, as was the case at Michigan, is not AA, it's closer to racism. But don't worry; if Harvard applicants get in because of anything, it's because they deserve to be there. 'nuff said.</p>