Harvard to end EA - What do you think?

<p>I'm pasting this article here because I don't know how many of you regularly surf the Harvard forum. They call for other universities to end early application programs as well. What do you think?</p>

<hr>

<p>Harvard drops 'early action' admissions</p>

<p>By JUSTIN POPE, Associated Press Writer Tue Sep 12, 4:29 AM ET</p>

<p>BOSTON - In a change certain to shake up college admissions, Harvard University will ditch its "early action" round of applications on the grounds that it favors wealthier students over minorities and the poor. It called on other universities to follow suit.</p>

<p>Starting next year, Harvard will eliminate its early round of admissions that allows high school students to apply by Nov. 1 of their senior year and receive a decision — accept, reject or defer — by Dec. 15.</p>

<p>Applicants hoping to enter in the fall of 2008 will face a common application due date of Jan. 1.</p>

<p>"The college admissions process has become too pressured, too complex, and too vulnerable to public cynicism," said Harvard interim President Derek Bok. "We hope that doing away with early admission will improve the process and make it simpler and fairer."</p>

<p>Early-action applicants must agree not to apply early to other schools but can apply elsewhere in the spring and weigh all offers before picking a college by May. More commonly, colleges allow students to apply early-decision, which requires them to commit to attending if accepted.</p>

<p>Early admissions programs were designed to let students get the process out of the way once they had selected a college. Such programs also help schools like Harvard identify particularly enthusiastic applicants.</p>

<p>Acknowledging what many critics have long contended, Harvard said early admissions has become a strategic tactic for students trying to game the system to boost their admissions chances.</p>

<p>Other prestigious universities have tinkered with their early admissions policies but Harvard is the first to drop it outright.</p>

<p>"Early admission programs tend to advantage the advantaged," Bok said in a statement issued by the university. "Students from more sophisticated backgrounds and affluent high schools often apply early to increase their chances of admission, while minority students and students from rural areas, other countries, and high schools with fewer resources miss out.</p>

<p>"Students needing financial aid are disadvantaged by binding early-decision programs that prevent them from comparing aid packages," he said. "Others who apply early and gain admission to the college of their choice have less reason to work hard at their studies during their final year of high school."</p>

<p>Colleges typically take a higher percentage of early applicants, though the applicant pool is usually stronger, too. Last year, Harvard offered admission to about 21 percent of its early-action applicants, according to university figures. But its overall acceptance rate was just 9.3 percent.</p>

<p>Harvard's statement said the university would wait one year to implement the change in part to give other universities an opportunity also to drop their early programs. If other prominent schools follow, it could significantly change the admissions calendar and strategizing for high-achieving students.</p>

<p>William Fitzsimmons, dean of admissions at Harvard College, said the university would reconsider the decision after a few years if applicant quality suffered.</p>

<p>Hmm, I don't really mind. I wanted to apply SCEA to Stanford so the option is still there. Even so I'm not sure if I even want to apply early. I may want another semester counted into my gpa and rank before then.</p>

<p>I tend to agree that having EA causes people to try to figure out "the game" and figure out when the best time is to apply, what school to apply early to, basically what maximizes their chances to get in - even if it's just a tiny bump. That is pretty obvious on this forum; there are many posts about the benefits of applying EA.</p>

<p>I'm not much of one to talk ;) I got into Stanford early. Even so, I applied to other schools RD because I wasn't positive that I wanted to go to Stanford.</p>

<p>It makes sense that ED may help the "more wealthy" who are able to commit to a school without knowing about finanical aid, but I don't see how EA benefits the "more wealthy". </p>

<p>I actually always thought EA was a healthy option for a student, because s/he could relax by the holidays, knowing they (hopefully) had one admission....</p>

<p>i have to agree with mishdoob1, but, at the same time, if colleges don't want students gaming their chances, i don't think colleges should release their admission percentages and such. that way, all students could do is guess, eventually they will get tired of guessing.</p>

<p>yeah I don't see how EA helps rich people, although I can see how ED does.
yeah, I agree. I can't help thinking colleges kinda encourage people to strategize by releasing statistics; admissions have gotten so darn competative and colleges want it that way because selectivity makes them look good...eheh heh ¬_¬
I still kept doing my work after getting in EA, but maybe with a little more procrastination. ;)</p>

<p>most people who apply EA are playing the numbers game, they're applying to colleges more strategically than most college seniors.</p>

<p>within this group, i'd bet that there's much more wealthy people than poor people simply because richer people are more well-informed about this sort of stuff.</p>

<p>Or it might simply be CC, as it was for me lol =]</p>