<p>I didnt mean to imply that any OOS kids were off the chart unqualifies, just that they were appreciably less than average. </p>
<p>But how do you know that many OOS kids were “appreciably less than average” (and not athletes needed for a sport)?</p>
<p>*Your stats do not disprove that. Plenty of kids with between 500-600 SATs. *</p>
<p>Again, we don’t know if there are “plenty” and we don’t know if these are mostly OOS kids. </p>
<p>And, we can’t assume that such students are low in all 3 sections or just one section. For instance, a kid could have a 580 Math, but a 670 CR and 660 Writing. We can’t assume that admitted students with a low score in one section, don’t have adequate scores in the other 2 sections. Schools are often forgiving about that because they know that someone who scores lowish in math, but does well in CR and W will likely pursue a major related to that student’s strengths. And, the same goes the other way around (students who are strong in math, but may not be strong in CR or W - often because of ESL issues or similar).</p>
<p>Middle Quartiles for Bing</p>
<p>SAT Critical Reading: 580 - 670<br>
SAT Math: 620 - 700
SAT Writing: 570 - 660</p>