<p>“I am a firm believer that once you cross a certain “threshold” of grades and scores, (i.e. you grades/scores demonstrate you are qualified to handle the Yale workload) it’s no longer about grades but about what else you can add to the campus.”</p>
<p>I, too, had this impression before I did the SCEA analysis. But it’s hard to argue with the implication of the fact that 30/32 of the unhooked SCEA acceptees had SAT 1 scores over 2310+. I assume your threshold of one’s being able to handle the workload does not exceed 2300.</p>
<p>I do not want to imply that I agree with the seemingly continued consideration Yale has toward SAT scores even beyond 2300; I think that anything 2250+ should be treated almost equally given the minor differences in raw scores accounting for the total composite scores.</p>
<p>“While some of his points are valid, I’d like to point out the obvious that the sample size in CC is limited”</p>
<p>I have noted these shortcomings and hope that those who find these limitations minor enough to consider the data useful are, nevertheless, aware of the sample size and self-selecting nature.</p>
<p>“important factors such as essays and recommendations are not within our access, one shouldn’t necessarily not apply based on their GPA or something like that (in the case of chair2) or assume that you need to automatically match a score range.”</p>
<p>Other, subjective factors certainly affect admission, but the fact that the scores of those accepted SCEA are much more clustered near the top of the score range than are the scores of the general pool leads me to believe that scores do have a significant, threshold-like effect.</p>
<p>I doubt this threshold for admission SCEA is concrete, but it seems present and high.</p>
<p>This effect was not as present in my analysis of Princeton’s RD decisions, which may be due to a different policy at Princeton and/or differences in early and regular decision admissions.</p>