<p>In many ways the OP and his family have taken a molehill and made a mountain out of it. It has been mishandled from the start and it sounds like it continues to be mishandled going forward. Let me explain:</p>
<p>For purposes of this discussion, let’s assume that the OP has been a pillar of his school community (top grades - already mentioned IIRC, plenty of EC and leadership involvement, well liked by teachers and counselors alike). He has a brain-fart (typical of teen-aged boys) trying to look like a big-shot and in one hour makes himself suspended for the remainder of a term and expelled for another. Other than this, he is a model citizen.</p>
<p>Mistake 1 - Lawyering up. I understand asking for counsel to understand the process before you, but it sounds like OP and family took the approach of telling the lawyer to fight this thing to make it go away. Wasn’t going to work as the facts can’t go away and the environment we live in won’t let it be hidden. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out, but if the lawyer is asked to fight it, he will do his client’s bidding. My guess is that the lawyer advised that it was futile, but advice was ignored. Should have just fessed up and thrown yourself on the mercy of whatever administrative panel was adjudicating the matter. It shows a sense of honor and a desire to return to good standing in the community.</p>
<p>Mistake 2 - Not returning to the original school after the suspension is completed. This is more of the “make it go away” mentality that will not work. The bell cannot be unrung. Returning to the school with a sense of humility shows a greater strength than a fresh beginning. Yes, there may be parents who don’t want their kids hanging around with the OP, but by and large his peers should be forgiving (they understand brain-farts). With the right attitude (again humility and a desire to be a positive contributor again) will go a long way with teachers and most importantly guidance counselors. These are the people who knew the OP as a good citizen before the incident and will see that he continues to be a good citizen. When recommendations come around and they have to disclose the “terrorist incident”, the GC will cite the incident, mention that it was an isolated incident and that he has come back to be every bit the model citizen he was before the incident. This strategy gives the OP the best chance of a school looking beyond an isolated incident with solid continuous observations of good character surrounding it by the same people. </p>
<p>Not returning leaves the college 3 different observers of character who don’t have enough time to build a large positive history. 3 schools can’t be good for the transcript either. </p>
<p>However, mistake #1 probably made mistake #2 a necessity as they burned the bridges.</p>
<p>Mistake 3 - Going onto this other prep school. Even if you get in, the more you run from an incident, the guiltier you will look to any college where you apply. Geez, the kid even had to leave town. This must have been horrible. Staying put at the local Catholic school is probably better than moving on. Staying says you found a new home and have embraced it, not used it to hide until you could hide even better by leaving after a brief stay.</p>
<p>Bottom line, the OP and his family haven’t figured out that your past is impossible to escape. It sounds from the initial request for ways to hide the incident that they haven’t dealt with it at all in a personal way. Accept the mistake you’ve made and accept that you will spend a lifetime explaining it. If you don’t live in fear of your past, you won’t haven anything to fear.</p>