<p>NYDanceMom, </p>
<p>Your post is terrific and also shows the individual circumstances with regard to creating a list. If I understand you correctly, your D applied to 10 BFAs and then the BA non audition Indiana and the BA optional audition (for scholarships) at Muhlenberg, yes? That is very similar to what some candidates I have worked with are doing. And indeed, a motivated student can put in the energy to do 12 apps very well (my clients have done paper apps as you have). I think much more than 12 is just too many not so much because of the effort to each application but because I don't think it is necesssary to yield a positive outcome if one has the right list. It is hard to visit that many schools and if one is blessed with 10 acceptances, for example, in April and hasn't visited, it is harder to narrow them down by then. But it all depends on the kid. I had one girl apply to 13 schools last year, and 11 were BFA if I recall. She put LOTS of energy into all 13 apps. In December, she had gotten in ED to Tisch and that was that. Many kids who only want a BFA can make do with 8-10 BFAs plus two BAs. But things vary per student and also their qualifications and WHICH schools they put on the list in terms of balance. </p>
<p>I also agree that it is very difficult to asceratain one's chances artistically at a school because with very low acceptance rates, even the MOST talented kids will get denied at some schools. Also, a student can't do anything about their type and where they might fit into the make up of the class. But someone who is competitive artistically, enough to be accepted to a BFA in general, should yield at least one acceptance with a balanced list of BFA schools. Assessing one's artistic competitiveness is not easily defined, but one can do self assessments in comparison to others they know who have been accepted, look at how they fare in casting in their own region or at outside summer programs, etc., ask voice/acting/dance teachers who are familiar with students who have gone onto BFA programs how they compare in terms of their skill sets, etc. If a student has received regional, state, or national recognition (though this is NOT required to get into a BFA), it is another inkling that the student may be able to compete in the BFA applicant pool. </p>
<p>Yes, it is hard to tell which BFA programs are harder to get into than others because unlike regular college admissions, ALL these schools have very low admit rates, often in the single digits. BUT some BFA programs do not draw from the same applicant pools as others, and/or are not always chosen by applicants who get admitted but are also admitted to a more competitive or well known program, thus opening up slots to others at the schools where they were also accepted. I'm afraid to give examples for fear of offending anyone, but I'll give ONE.....for example, I think the artistic selectivity and the applicant pool and difficulty of being admitted talent wise is different at CCM/CMU than at Milliken or Pace. For some kids, they would have a better chance at Pace/Milliken than CCM/CMU due to their skill sets, even if all of these schools have low BFA admit rates. While there is some overlap of their applicant pools, many who I know who applied to CCM/CMU, did not apply to schools like Pace/Milliken or if they did, and were accepted to CCM/CMU and Pace/Milliken, did not choose Pace or Milliken over CCM or CMU. Now, Pace or Millken are great options and I have recommended one or the other to many BFA candidates and so don't get me wrong. I am giving an example of the artistic selectivity aspect only. </p>
<p>Also, your D appears to have the academic qualifications to get into many of these schools, but I have worked with many clients who do not have academic stats in the ballpark for SOME of the BFA schools and so creating the right list for them is crucial in order to yield results. They have all gotten admitted to some schools, but had they gone with their original list they presented to me when we connected, their results would not have been the same. </p>
<p>The quantity of schools does matter and more schools can hedge one's bets as you say, particularly when the BFA schools are unpredictable with such low admit rates! But the RIGHT list is also very important in order to yield results. Those who apply with a hodge podge of schools they have heard a lot about or they simply know offer MT without regard to fit and without regard to their ability, will likely not achieve as many acceptances to those with an appropriate and well thought out list, no matter the length. </p>
<p>I also agree that if one is looking for a good financial aid package, either need based or merit based, it helps to look widely. </p>
<p>Also, some are limitted to how many auditions they can possibly attend, even with the Unifieds factored in. I think much more than 10 auditions would start to feel a little crazy in terms of time but also costs a lot. Still, people have to do what works for them. Generally, 8-12 schools (BFA and BA inc.) works for most applicants.</p>