<p>I think the top LACs put quite a lot of weight on standardized test scores, more so than the ivies. You would probably be cast as the “smart slacker” who could have done better in school if you just tried a bit harder. But those SAT scores should make up for your GPA, I think…</p>
<p>You have a lot to gain by trying to communicate your approximate rank to those colleges.</p>
<p>If you provide a rank, even just a general idea, they are likely to consider your grades very differently. Your grades are quite low for those schools, but your class rank is very solid.</p>
<p>Is there any way at all that you can give the schools some ballpark of where you would be placed?</p>
<p>For instance, many, many schools provide a general breakdown on the class by percentiles, even though they don’t rank directly. Or sometimes college counselors will write things like, “We don’t rank, but if we did, Student X would likely be in the top 10%,” or whatever. </p>
<p>I applied as a high school student with a 3.45 GPA, 800 CR, 680 M, 800 W, 800 SAT II French, 800 SAT II Literature, and I was waitlisted at Swarthmore and Northwestern and rejected at Princeton. (Happy ending: I got in to NU off the waitlist and ended up transferring to Harvard with a 3.8 two years later. So if you were, in fact, a high school slacker, you may have options later.) At the same time, my class rank was much, much lower than yours: I think I was in the third decile.</p>
<p>I mention all this because I think that your ability to communicate your relative class rank may actually have a significant effect on your outcomes this year. So think about it long and hard, and talk to your school about it, before you repost here saying “There’s nothing I can do; we just don’t rank, and there’s an end on’t.” :)</p>